Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

CVE-2026-1760: Libsoup: soupserver: denial of service via http request smuggling

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.47% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: libsoup (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 3.4.4-150600.3.37.1; libsoup2 (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 2.74.3-150600.4.30.1; libsoup (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 3.6.6-160000.1.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to libsoup (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 3.4.4-150600.3.37.1; libsoup2 (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 2.74.3-150600.4.30.1; libsoup (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 3.6.6-160000.1.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A flaw was found in SoupServer. This HTTP request smuggling vulnerability occurs because SoupServer improperly handles requests that combine Transfer-Encoding: chunked and Connection: keep-alive headers. A remote, unauthenticated client can exploit this by sending specially crafted requests, causing SoupServer to fail to close the connection as required by RFC 9112. This allows the attacker to smuggle additional requests over the persistent connection, leading to unintended request processing and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions.

MediumCVSS 5.3 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 2, 2026
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 40th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · redhat
5.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-1760

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for red hat records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

    • all versionsaffected

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

    • all versionsunknown

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

    • all versionsaffected

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    • all versionsaffected

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

    • all versionsaffected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12libsoup2.4from 0—
Debian:12libsoup3from 0—
openSUSE:Leap 15.6libsoupbefore 3.4.4-150600.3.37.13.4.4-150600.3.37.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6libsoup2before 2.74.3-150600.4.30.12.74.3-150600.4.30.1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0libsoupbefore 3.6.6-160000.1.13.6.6-160000.1.1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0libsoup2before 2.74.3-160000.4.12.74.3-160000.4.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedlibsoupbefore 3.6.6-2.13.6.6-2.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedlibsoup2before 2.74.3-18.12.74.3-18.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOSlibsoupbefore 3.0.4-150400.3.37.13.0.4-150400.3.37.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2libsoupbefore 2.68.4-150200.4.33.12.68.4-150200.4.33.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3libsoup2before 2.74.2-150400.3.31.12.74.2-150400.3.31.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7libsoupbefore 3.4.4-150600.3.37.13.4.4-150600.3.37.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7libsoup2before 2.74.3-150600.4.30.12.74.3-150600.4.30.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSSlibsoupbefore 2.62.2-5.37.12.62.2-5.37.1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0libsoupbefore 3.4.2-14.13.4.2-14.1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1libsoupbefore 3.4.4-slfo.1.1_7.13.4.4-slfo.1.1_7.1
SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2libsoupbefore 3.6.6-160000.1.13.6.6-160000.1.1

Same product

red hat: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script
    52Plan
  • CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection
    44Plan
  • CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-1485Jan 27, 2026 · Glib: glib: local denial of service via buffer underflow in content type parsing
    11Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-1489Jan 27, 2026 · Glib: glib: memory corruption via integer overflow in unicode case conversion
    21Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-1761Feb 2, 2026 · Libsoup: stack-based buffer overflow in libsoup multipart response parsingmultipart http response
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:libsoup33.6.5-8 · Debian:14Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:libsoup3.4.4-150600.3.37.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:libsoup22.74.3-150600.4.30.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
suse:libsoup3.4.4-150600.3.37.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)
suse:libsoup22.74.3-150600.4.30.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-1452353 days apartLibsoup: libsoup: duplicate host header handling causes host-parsing discrepancy (first- vs last-value wins)
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-103399240 days apartLibsoup: soupserver: http/1 request smuggling via undrained expect: 100-continue body
    21Monitor
  • CVE-2026-6324116 days apartLibsoup: libsoup: http request smuggling via unsigned to signed conversion error
    19Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
Low

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (2 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records