CVE-2026-91149: Cockpit: cockpit: denial of service via unbounded connection thread spawning
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: cockpit (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8; cockpit-bridge (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8; cockpit-doc (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to cockpit (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8; cockpit-bridge (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8; cockpit-doc (AlmaLinux:9) 356.4-1.el9_8 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Cockpit. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by initiating and sustaining numerous simultaneous connections to the `cockpit-tls` service. This forces the service to create an unbounded number of detached threads, consuming system resources such as memory and file descriptors. The primary consequence is a denial of service (DoS), leading to degradation or complete unavailability of the Cockpit service for legitimate users.
- Published
- Sep 18, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 47th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-770
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:356.4-1.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:366.1-1.el10_3 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:356.4-1.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:366.1-1.el9_9 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:356.4-1.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:366.1-1.el9_9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-bridge | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-doc | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-packagekit | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-storaged | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-system | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-ws | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | cockpit-ws-selinux | before 356.4-1.el9_8 | 356.4-1.el9_8 |
| Debian:12 | cockpit | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | cockpit | before 368-1 | 368-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | cockpit | before 370-1.1 | 370-1.1 |
| Rocky Linux:10 | cockpit | before 0:356.4-1.el10_2.rocky.0.1 | 0:356.4-1.el10_2.rocky.0.1 |
| Rocky Linux:9 | cockpit | before 0:356.4-1.el9_8.rocky.0.1 | 0:356.4-1.el9_8.rocky.0.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-91142Sep 18, 2026 · Cockpit: cockpit: unauthorized modification of login records via integer overflow14Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-91147Sep 18, 2026 · Cockpit: cockpit: denial of service in `cockpit-ws` due to url-root handling without a trailing slash23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-92745Sep 18, 2026 · Cockpit-machines: cockpit-machines: information disclosure of rhsm offline token via process arguments20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:cockpit | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-bridge | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-doc | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-packagekit | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-storaged | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-system | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-ws | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-ws-selinux | 356.4-1.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:cockpit | 368-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cockpit | 370-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:cockpit | 0:356.4-1.el9_8.rocky.0.1 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1864943 days apartGstreamer1-plugins-good: gst-plugins-good: unbounded memory growth in rtph264depay and rtph265depay rtp depayloaders30Monitor
- CVE-2026-11232252 days apartKrb5: mit krb5 kadmind unauthenticated cpu dos via auth_gssapi client states cleanup30Monitor
- CVE-2026-1571166 days apartLibsoup: soupwebsocketconnection: libsoup: websocket remote denial of service via oversized control frame protocol violation30Monitor
- CVE-2025-32049533 days apartLibsoup: denial of service attack to websocket server30Monitor
- CVE-2026-8523128 days apartLibtirpc: libtirpc: denial of service via unbounded memory allocation during rpcsec_gss decoding26Monitor
- CVE-2026-11231952 days apartKrb5: mit krb5 kadmind authenticated memory exhaustion dos via unbounded rpc xdr allocation26Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or ThrottlingCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- FloodingCAPEC-125likelihood: High · Medium
- Excessive AllocationCAPEC-130likelihood: Medium · Medium
- XML Ping of the DeathCAPEC-147likelihood: Low · Medium
- Exponential Data ExpansionCAPEC-197likelihood: High · Medium
- Serialized Data Parameter BlowupCAPEC-229likelihood: High · High
- Serialized Data with Nested PayloadsCAPEC-230likelihood: Medium · High
- Oversized Serialized Data PayloadsCAPEC-231likelihood: Medium · High
- HTTP DoSCAPEC-469Low
ATT&CK techniques
- Network Denial of Service:Direct Network FloodT1498.001
- Network Denial of Service:Reflection AmplificationT1498.002
- Endpoint Denial of ServiceT1499
- Endpoint Denial of Service: OS Exhaustion FloodT1499.001
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Service Exhaustion FloodT1499.002
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Application Exhaustion FloodT1499.003
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.