CVE-2026-6893: Dracut: dracut: root code execution via dhcp options command injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 69.7% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: azl3 dracut 102-13 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 dracut 102-13 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in dracut. A remote attacker on the adjacent network can exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) options, such as a malicious hostname, to a system using dracut's legacy DHCP path. These options are improperly handled and written into temporary shell scripts without proper escaping, leading to command injection. This allows the attacker to achieve root code execution within the initramfs, potentially compromising the system's boot and network behavior.
- ALSA-2026:26532
- ALSA-2026:26533
- ALSA-2026:26534
- openSUSE-SU-2026:11076-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21054-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21749-1
- RHSA-2026:26532
- RHSA-2026:26533
- RHSA-2026:26534
- RHSA-2026:26713
- RHSA-2026:57580
- RHSA-2026:57772
- RHSA-2026:57775
- RHSA-2026:57785
- RHSA-2026:61252
- RHSA-2026:62269
- RHSA-2026:69118
- RHSA-2026:69119
- RHSA-2026:74499
- RHSA-2026:79114
- Published
- Jun 10, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 27, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| enterprise linux | 10.2 | cpe:2.3:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
| enterprise linux eus | 10.0 | cpe:2.3:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0 |
| rhel els | 7 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_els:7 |
| enterprise linux | 8 | cpe:2.3:redhat:enterprise_linux:8 |
| rhel tus | 8.8 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_tus:8.8 |
| rhel e4s | 8.8 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_e4s:8.8 |
| enterprise linux | 9 | cpe:2.3:redhat:enterprise_linux:9 |
| rhel e4s | 9.2 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.2 |
| rhel e4s | 9.4 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.4 |
| rhel eus | 9.6 | cpe:2.3:redhat:rhel_eus:9.6 |
| openshift | 4.13 | cpe:2.3:redhat:openshift:4.13 |
| openshift | 4.14 | cpe:2.3:redhat:openshift:4.14 |
and 6 more
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:107-7.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
- 0:105-4.el10_0.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION
- 0:004-413.el6_10 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:004-414.el6_10 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
- 0:033-577.el7_9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 0:049-244.git20260529.el8_10 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- 0:049-138.git20220131.el8_4.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
- 0:049-138.git20220131.el8_4.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- 0:049-203.git20220511.el8_6.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
- 0:049-203.git20220511.el8_6.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service
- 0:049-223.git20230119.el8_8.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
- 0:049-223.git20230119.el8_8.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:057-115.git20260527.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:057-115.git20260527.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-caps | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-config-generic | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-config-rescue | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-live | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-network | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-squash | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dracut-tools | before 107-7.el10_2 | 107-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-caps | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-config-generic | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-config-rescue | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-live | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-network | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-squash | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dracut-tools | before 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 | 049-244.git20260529.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-caps | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-config-generic | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-config-rescue | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-live | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-network | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-squash | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dracut-tools | before 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 | 057-115.git20260527.el9_8 |
+96
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-3238Jun 8, 2026 · Samba: denial of service against ad dc wins server31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-11837Jun 10, 2026 · Ansible-collection-ansible-posix: ansible.posix authorized_key: local privilege escalation via symlink-following chown29Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-53701Jun 11, 2026 · Gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: gstreamer: out-of-bounds write in h.266/vvc pps picture partition parser26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 dracut 102-13 on Azure Linux 3.0 | Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:dracut | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-caps | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-config-generic | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-config-rescue | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-live | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-network | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-squash | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dracut-tools | 107-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:dracut | 112-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:dracut | 110+suse.35.g9834432-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-caps | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-config-generic | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-config-rescue | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-debuginfo | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-debugsource | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-fips | 0:004-413.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_els:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-kernel | 0:004-413.el6_10 · Red Hat:rhel_els:6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-live | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-network | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-squash | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dracut-tools | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:dracut | 0:107-7.el10_2 · Rocky Linux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:dracut | 059+suse.722.gdd9d67ff5-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-10230215 days apartSamba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-463164 days apartCockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-480230 days apartCockpit: cockpit: arbitrary command execution via crafted links in system logs ui32Monitor
- CVE-2026-1652450 days apartPcp: pcp linux_sockets pmda: arbitrary command execution via command injection31Monitor
- CVE-2026-7999276 days apartEmacs: emacs: command injection via crafted filenames in tramp31Monitor
- CVE-2026-8483884 days apartRpm: command injection in rpmuncompress via unescaped filenames passed to popen()31Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26533
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26534
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26713
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57580
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57772
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57775
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57785
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61252
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62269
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62409
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62549
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:63044
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65839
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65851
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67857
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69118
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:69119
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70586
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70615
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.