Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

CVE-2025-4948: Libsoup: integer underflow in soup_multipart_new_from_message() leading to denial of service in libsoup

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.81% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 56.6% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-7 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.4.4-8; azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.4.4-8; cbl2 libsoup 3.0.4-7 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.0.4-8.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-7 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.4.4-8; azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.4.4-8; cbl2 libsoup 3.0.4-7 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.0.4-8 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A flaw was found in the soup_multipart_new_from_message() function of the libsoup HTTP library, which is commonly used by GNOME and other applications to handle web communications. The issue occurs when the library processes specially crafted multipart messages. Due to improper validation, an internal calculation can go wrong, leading to an integer underflow. This can cause the program to access invalid memory and crash. As a result, any application or server using libsoup could be forced to exit unexpectedly, creating a denial-of-service (DoS) risk.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 19, 2025
Updated
Jun 30, 2026
EPSS
0.8% · 56th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.8%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · redhat
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-4948

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for red hat records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup libsoup

    • up to and including 3.6.5affected · semver

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

    • 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

    • all versionsunknown

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support

    • 0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:2.62.2-6.el7_9 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    • 0:2.62.3-9.el8_10 and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:2.62.3-9.el8_10 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support

    • 0:2.62.3-1.el8_2.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support

    • 0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support

    • 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service

    • 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions

    • 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support

    • 0:2.62.3-3.el8_8.5 and laternot affected · rpm

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

    • 0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2 and laternot affected · rpm

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10libsoup3-docbefore 3.6.5-3.el10_0.63.6.5-3.el10_0.6
AlmaLinux:8libsoupbefore 2.62.3-9.el8_102.62.3-9.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8libsoup-develbefore 2.62.3-9.el8_102.62.3-9.el8_10
AlmaLinux:9libsoupbefore 2.72.0-10.el9_6.22.72.0-10.el9_6.2
AlmaLinux:9libsoup-develbefore 2.72.0-10.el9_6.22.72.0-10.el9_6.2
Debian:11libsoup2.4before 2.72.0-2+deb11u32.72.0-2+deb11u3
Debian:12libsoup2.4from 0—
Debian:12libsoup3from 0—
Debian:13libsoup3before 3.6.5-23.6.5-2
openSUSE:Leap 15.6libsoupbefore 3.4.4-150600.3.10.13.4.4-150600.3.10.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6libsoup2before 2.74.3-150600.4.9.12.74.3-150600.4.9.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedlibsoupbefore 3.6.5-5.13.6.5-5.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedlibsoup2before 2.74.3-11.12.74.3-11.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0libsoup3before 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.60:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0libsoup3-debuginfobefore 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.60:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0libsoup3-debugsourcebefore 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.60:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0libsoup3-develbefore 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.60:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0libsoup3-docbefore 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.60:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibsoup-debuginfobefore 0:2.62.3-9.el8_100:2.62.3-9.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibsoup-debugsourcebefore 0:2.62.3-9.el8_100:2.62.3-9.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibsoup-develbefore 0:2.62.3-9.el8_100:2.62.3-9.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoslibsoupbefore 0:2.62.3-9.el8_100:2.62.3-9.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibsoupbefore 0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.20:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibsoup-debuginfobefore 0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.20:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2

+47

Same product

red hat: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script
    52Plan
  • CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection
    44Plan
  • CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-3931May 14, 2025 · Yggdrasil: local privilege escalation in yggdrasil
    31Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-4476May 16, 2025 · Libsoup: null pointer dereference in libsoup may lead to denial of service
    17Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-4945May 19, 2025 · Libsoup: integer overflow in cookie expiration date handling in libsoup
    14Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-7 on Azure Linux 3.03.4.4-8 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
azl3 libsoup 3.4.4-8 on Azure Linux 3.03.4.4-8 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 libsoup 3.0.4-7 on CBL Mariner 2.03.0.4-8 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 libsoup 3.0.4-7 on CBL-Mariner 2.03.0.4-8 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 libsoup 3.0.4-8 on CBL Mariner 2.03.0.4-8 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
almalinux:libsoup2.72.0-10.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libsoup-devel2.72.0-10.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libsoup3-doc3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
debian:libsoup2.42.72.0-2+deb11u3 · Debian:11Package registry (OSV)
debian:libsoup33.6.5-2 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:libsoup3.4.4-150600.3.10.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:libsoup22.74.3-150600.4.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup-debuginfo0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup-debugsource0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup-devel0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup30:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup3-debuginfo0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup3-debugsource0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup3-devel0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libsoup3-doc0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:libsoup0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:libsoup30:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 · Rocky Linux:10Package registry (OSV)
suse:libsoup2.62.2-5.15.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSSPackage registry (OSV)
suse:libsoup3.4.4-150600.3.10.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6Package registry (OSV)
suse:libsoup22.74.3-150600.4.9.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-33999339 days apartXorg: xwayland: x.org x server: denial of service via integer underflow in xkb compatibility map handling
    31Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-191 · Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (15 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records