CVE-2025-3931: Yggdrasil: local privilege escalation in yggdrasil
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: github.com/RedHatInsights/yggdrasil yggdrasil 0.4.7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/RedHatInsights/yggdrasil yggdrasil 0.4.7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Yggdrasil, which acts as a system broker, allowing the processes to communicate to other children's "worker" processes through the DBus component. Yggdrasil creates a DBus method to dispatch messages to workers. However, it misses authentication and authorization checks, allowing every system user to call it. One available Yggdrasil worker acts as a package manager with capabilities to create and enable new repositories and install or remove packages. This flaw allows an attacker with access to the system to leverage the lack of authentication on the dispatch message to force the Yggdrasil worker to install arbitrary RPM packages. This issue results in local privilege escalation, enabling the attacker to access and modify sensitive system data.
- Published
- May 14, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 7th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-280
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
github.com/RedHatInsights/yggdrasil yggdrasil
- before 0.4.7affected · semver
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 and laternot affected · rpm
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Satellite 6
- all versionsunknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | yggdrasil | before 0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | yggdrasil-devel | before 0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Go | github.com/redhatinsights/yggdrasil | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/redhatinsights/yggdrasil | up to and including 0.4.6 | — |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20250515T200012-1.1 | 0.0.20250515T200012-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | yggdrasil | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | yggdrasil-debuginfo | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | yggdrasil-debugsource | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | yggdrasil-devel | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | yggdrasil-examples-debuginfo | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
| Rocky Linux:10 | yggdrasil | before 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-4382May 9, 2025 · Grub2: grub allow access to encrypted device through cli once root device is unlocked via tpm23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-4432May 9, 2025 · Ring: some aes functions may panic when overflow checking is enabled in ring21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-4476May 16, 2025 · Libsoup: null pointer dereference in libsoup may lead to denial of service17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/RedHatInsights/yggdrasil yggdrasil | 0.4.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| almalinux:yggdrasil | 0.4.5-3.el10_0 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:yggdrasil-devel | 0.4.5-3.el10_0 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20250515T200012-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:yggdrasil | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:yggdrasil-debuginfo | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:yggdrasil-debugsource | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:yggdrasil-devel | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:yggdrasil-examples-debuginfo | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:yggdrasil | 0:0.4.5-3.el10_0 · Rocky Linux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-280 · Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or PrivilegesCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.