CVE-2026-81627: Qemu-kvm: vapic writable rom alias can escape the option-rom window and expose locked smram
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.19% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 qemu 10.1.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 10.1.0-2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 qemu 10.1.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 10.1.0-2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
- Published
- Sep 18, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 8th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-787
Report tools
Action score
32
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 8.2
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux for NVIDIA 26
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | qemu | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | qemu | before 1:11.1.2+ds-1 | 1:11.1.2+ds-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | qemu | before 10.0.13-160000.2.1 | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | qemu-linux-user | before 10.0.13-160000.2.1 | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | qemu | before 11.1.1-2.1 | 11.1.1-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | qemu-linux-user | before 10.0.13-160000.2.1 | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | qemu | before 10.0.13-160000.2.1 | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-85234Sep 15, 2026 · Tftp: tftp-hpa: denial of service due to out-of-bounds read/write in remap engine30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-86320Sep 17, 2026 · Flatpak-builder: host code execution via `git am` hook execution in patch source extraction (`use-git-am`)31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-93676Sep 18, 2026 · Xdg-dbus-proxy: xdg-dbus-proxy: filtering for broadcast messages bypasses path/interface/member checks12Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 qemu 10.1.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 10.1.0-2 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:qemu | 1:11.1.2+ds-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:qemu | 11.1.1-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:qemu-linux-user | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:qemu | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:qemu-linux-user | 10.0.13-160000.2.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-11977742 days apartGstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: stack buffer overflow in h.266/vvc parser35Monitor
- CVE-2026-8647626 days apartGstreamer1-plugins-base: gst-plugins-base: heap buffer overflow via unvalidated gstvideometa plane extents in gst_video_frame_map_id and video_meta_deserialize33Monitor
- CVE-2026-971856 days apartGimp: gimp: out-of-bounds write in gimpressionist plugin via crafted preset file31Monitor
- CVE-2026-10125818 days apartGhostscript: ghostscript: -dsafer sandbox bypass via type 5 shading oob write and procedure-stream use-after-free31Monitor
- CVE-2026-1822051 days apartBinutils: binutils: out-of-bounds write in bfd dlx elf backend relocation processing31Monitor
- CVE-2026-384265 days apartQemu-kvm: hyperv/syndbg: missing mapped-length guard after cpu_physical_memory_map causes host oob write31Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.