CVE-2026-71217: Iperf3: iperf3 server accepts unbounded peer-controlled json parameters enabling remote denial of service via resource exhaustion
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.63% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: azl3 iperf3 3.17.1-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.17.1-5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 iperf3 3.17.1-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.17.1-5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in iperf3. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted control-channel JSON with oversized numeric parameters, such as `parallel` and `len`, which are not properly validated by the server. This improper input validation can lead to excessive stream and thread creation, as well as large buffer allocations, causing resource exhaustion. Consequently, this can result in a Denial of Service (DoS) on the affected iperf3 server.
- Published
- Aug 11, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 31, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | iperf3 | before 3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 | 3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | iperf3 | before 3.5-12.el8_10.1 | 3.5-12.el8_10.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | iperf3 | before 3.9-17.el9_8.1 | 3.9-17.el9_8.1 |
| Debian:12 | iperf3 | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | iperf3 | before 3.22-0.1 | 3.22-0.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | iperf | before 3.21-160000.1.1 | 3.21-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | iperf | before 3.22-1.1 | 3.22-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | iperf3 | before 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 | 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | iperf3-debuginfo | before 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 | 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | iperf3-debugsource | before 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 | 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | iperf3 | before 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | iperf3-debuginfo | before 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | iperf3-debugsource | before 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | iperf3 | before 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 | 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | iperf3-debuginfo | before 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 | 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | iperf3-debugsource | before 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 | 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 |
| Rocky Linux:10 | iperf3 | before 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 | 0:3.17.1-6.el10_2.1 |
| Rocky Linux:8 | iperf3 | before 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 |
| Rocky Linux:9 | iperf3 | before 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 | 0:3.9-17.el9_8.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 | iperf | before 3.22-150000.3.18.1 | 3.22-150000.3.18.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro Extras 6.2 | iperf | before 3.21-160000.1.1 | 3.21-160000.1.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-63623Aug 10, 2026 · Libvirt: information disclosure via world-readable storage volume images during clone/convert22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-6426Aug 10, 2026 · Qemu-kvm: vhost inflight migration vmstate integer type mismatch causes out-of-bounds access17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-71218Aug 11, 2026 · Iperf3: unbounded peer-controlled allocation in iperf3 json_read() allows unauthenticated remote memory exhaustion21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 iperf3 3.17.1-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.17.1-5 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:iperf3 | 3.5-12.el8_10.1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:iperf3 | 3.22-0.1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:iperf | 3.22-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:iperf3 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:iperf3-debuginfo | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:iperf3-debugsource | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:iperf3 | 0:3.5-12.el8_10.1 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:iperf | 3.21-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro Extras 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:iperf | 3.22-150000.3.18.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-09-20 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+40 d
- TodayOct 31, 2026+82 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Found by AISLE in partnershipRed Hat.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-9702748 days apartFlatpak: flatpak: denial of service via unsanitized keys in exported desktop entry / d-bus service files14Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.