Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

CVE-2026-2673: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.44% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.5.6, 3.6.2; azl3 nodejs24 24.13.0-3 on Azure Linux 3.0 24.14.1-1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.5.6, 3.6.2; azl3 nodejs24 24.13.0-3 on Azure Linux 3.0 24.14.1-1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 13, 2026
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 38th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

26

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-2673

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl
siemenssimatic cn 4100 firmware
siemenssimatic cn 4100

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.6
  • openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.2
  • siemens simatic cn 4100 firmwarebefore 5.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.2affected · semver
    • 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.6affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.22opensslfrom 3.5.0 · before 3.5.6-r03.5.6-r0
Debian:13opensslbefore 3.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.5-1~deb13u2
Debian:14opensslbefore 3.6.2-13.6.2-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0openssl-3before 3.5.0-160000.8.13.5.0-160000.8.1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0openssl-3before 3.5.0-160000.7.13.5.0-160000.7.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-3before 3.5.3-4.13.5.3-4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2opensslbefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.5-2.el10_21:3.5.5-2.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-develbefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosopensslbefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosopenssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.5-3.el9_81:3.5.5-3.el9_8
Red Hat:hummingbird:1opensslbefore 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum10:3.5.6-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1openssl-config-fipsbefore 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum10:3.5.6-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1openssl-develbefore 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum10:3.5.6-0.1.hum1
Red Hat:hummingbird:1openssl-devel-enginebefore 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum10:3.5.6-0.1.hum1

+4

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-22796Jan 27, 2026 · ASN1_TYPE Type Confusion in the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function
    21Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-15467Jan 27, 2026 · Stack buffer overflow in CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData parsing
    57Plan
  • Later →CVE-2026-28386Apr 7, 2026 · Out-of-bounds Read in AES-CFB-128 on X86-64 with AVX-512 Support
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.5.6Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.6.2Vendor (CNA)
azl3 nodejs24 24.13.0-3 on Azure Linux 3.024.14.1-1 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
alpine:openssl3.5.6-r0 · Alpine:v3.22Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl3.5.5-1~deb13u2 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-33.5.3-4.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-config-fips0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debugsource1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel-engine0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:3.5.5-2.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-33.5.0-160000.7.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
Low

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records