Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

CVE-2025-15467: Stack buffer overflow in CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData parsing

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 57/100)

  • Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 74.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.5% of all records.
  • This probability rose by 19 points in the last 7 days.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.19, 3.3.6, 3.4.4.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.19, 3.3.6, 3.4.4 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData or EnvelopedData message with maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow. Impact summary: A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial of Service, or potentially remote code execution. When parsing CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any authentication or tag verification occurs. Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME (Auth)EnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable. Because the overflow occurs prior to authentication, no valid key material is required to trigger it. While exploitability to remote code execution depends on platform and toolchain mitigations, the stack-based write primitive represents a severe risk. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.1—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Jan 27, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
EPSS
74.7% · 99th percentile▲ 19

Report tools

JSON

Action score

57

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
22 / 30 · 74.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-15467

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.19
  • openssl openssl3.1.0 and later · before 3.3.6
  • openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.4
  • openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.5
  • openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.1affected · semver
    • 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.5affected · semver
    • 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.4affected · semver
    • 3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.6affected · semver
    • 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.19affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:9opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
Alpine:v3.17opensslfrom 3.0.0 · before 3.0.19-r03.0.19-r0
Alpine:v3.20opensslfrom 3.0.0 · before 3.3.6-r03.3.6-r0
Alpine:v3.22opensslfrom 3.0.0 · before 3.5.5-r03.5.5-r0
Debian:12opensslbefore 3.0.18-1~deb12u23.0.18-1~deb12u2
Debian:13opensslbefore 3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.4-1~deb13u2
Debian:14opensslbefore 3.5.5-13.5.5-1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6openssl-3before 3.1.4-150600.5.42.13.1.4-150600.5.42.1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0openssl-3before 3.5.0-160000.5.13.5.0-160000.5.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-3before 3.5.3-2.13.5.3-2.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0opensslbefore 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.61:3.2.2-16.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0openssl-develbefore 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.61:3.2.2-16.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0openssl-libsbefore 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.61:3.2.2-16.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0openssl-perlbefore 1:3.2.2-16.el10_0.61:3.2.2-16.el10_0.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1

+46

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-22795Jan 27, 2026 · Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in PKCS#12 parsing
    22Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-22796Jan 27, 2026 · ASN1_TYPE Type Confusion in the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function
    21Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-2673Mar 13, 2026 · OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group
    26Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.0.19Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.3.6Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.4.4Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.5.5Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.6.1Vendor (CNA)
almalinux:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-devel1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-libs1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-perl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
alpine:openssl3.0.19-r0 · Alpine:v3.17Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl3.0.18-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-33.1.4-150600.5.42.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-config-fips0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debugsource1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel-engine0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Rocky Linux:10Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-33.1.4-150600.5.42.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSSPackage registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-33.2.3-150700.5.24.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-3-livepatches0.3-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×5

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:82026-01-28
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:152026-01-30
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:12026-02-03
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-03-14
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02026-04-07

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoCsame day
  3. TodayOct 29, 2026+275 d
EPSS, last 120 days+19% in 7 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-3178970 days apartHeap Buffer Overflow in Hexadecimal Conversion
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-7383133 days apartPossible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-63072210 days apartHeap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-72897245 days apartOut-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-694190 days apartOut of bounds write in PKCS12_get_friendlyname() UTF-8 conversion
    29Monitor
  • CVE-2025-681600 days apartHeap out-of-bounds write in BIO_f_linebuffer on short writes
    18Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records