CVE-2026-16531: Pcp: pcp: arbitrary file creation via path traversal in pmproxy logger servlet
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: pcp (Debian:14) 7.2.0-1; pcp (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 6.2.0-160000.4.1; pcp (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 6.3.8-3.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pcp (Debian:14) 7.2.0-1; pcp (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 6.2.0-160000.4.1; pcp (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 6.3.8-3.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a path traversal vulnerability in the PCP pmproxy logger servlet using a crafted hostname. This allows arbitrary file and directory creation, potentially leading to a denial of service.
- Published
- Jul 30, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 10, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 47th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 0:7.1.5-6.el10 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pcp | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | pcp | before 7.2.0-1 | 7.2.0-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | pcp | before 6.2.0-160000.4.1 | 6.2.0-160000.4.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | pcp | before 6.3.8-3.1 | 6.3.8-3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | pcp | before 6.2.0-150400.5.15.1 | 6.2.0-150400.5.15.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | pcp | before 6.2.0-150500.8.9.1 | 6.2.0-150500.8.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 | pcp | before 6.2.0-150600.3.12.1 | 6.2.0-150600.3.12.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | pcp | before 6.2.0-6.32.1 | 6.2.0-6.32.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | pcp | before 6.2.0-2.1 | 6.2.0-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | pcp | before 6.2.0-slfo.1.1_6.1 | 6.2.0-slfo.1.1_6.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | pcp | before 6.2.0-160000.4.1 | 6.2.0-160000.4.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-16529Jul 30, 2026 · Pcp: pcp: denial of service due to signed integer overflow30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-16530Jul 30, 2026 · Pcp: pcp: remote denial of service and information leakage26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-58218Jul 30, 2026 · Samba: dns signing dos via tkey name cache exhaustion21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:pcp | 7.2.0-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:pcp | 6.3.8-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:pcp | 6.2.0-2.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-9627555 days apartFlatpak: flatpak: arbitrary write access as root via extra-data extraction35Monitor
- CVE-2025-9566328 days apartPodman: podman kube play command may overwrite host files32Monitor
- CVE-2025-6020408 days apartLinux-pam: linux-pam directory traversal31Monitor
- CVE-2026-9627655 days apartFlatpak: flatpak: arbitrary write in host context via flatpak build-init26Monitor
- CVE-2026-10746670 days apartFlatpak-builder: local file exfiltration via `file24Monitor
- CVE-2026-8551883 days apartOpenscap: openscap: arbitrary file write via path traversal in source datastream decomposition24Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.