Rpcbind: rpcbind: stack buffer overflow in rpcinfo rpcbdump() short-mode version-list formatting
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 rpcbind 1.2.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.2.9-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 rpcbind 1.2.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.2.9-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A stack-based buffer overflow was found in rpcbind's rpcinfo utility. In rpcbdump() short mode (used by `rpcinfo -s`), version numbers from a remote RPCBPROC_DUMP reply are written into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking. A user or administrator who runs `rpcinfo -s` against a malicious or compromised rpcbind endpoint could experience a crash or denial of service of the rpcinfo client.
- Published
- Jul 21, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 22, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-121
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | rpcbind | all versions | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | rpcbind | before 1.2.9-160000.2.1 | 1.2.9-160000.2.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | rpcbind | before 1.2.9-2.1 | 1.2.9-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | rpcbind | before 0.2.3-150000.5.17.1 | 0.2.3-150000.5.17.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 | rpcbind | before 0.2.3-24.15.1 | 0.2.3-24.15.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | rpcbind | before 1.2.9-2.1 | 1.2.9-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | rpcbind | before 1.2.9-slfo.1.1_2.1 | 1.2.9-slfo.1.1_2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | rpcbind | before 1.2.9-160000.2.1 | 1.2.9-160000.2.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection42Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
- CVE-2025-4404Freeipa: idm: privilege escalation from host to domain admin in freeipa37Monitor
- CVE-2025-7493Freeipa: idm: privilege escalation from host to domain admin in freeipa36Monitor
- CVE-2025-49796Libxml: type confusion leads to denial of service (dos)36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 rpcbind 1.2.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 1.2.9-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| opensuse:rpcbind | 1.2.9-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rpcbind | 1.2.9-2.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1761169 days apartLibsoup: stack-based buffer overflow in libsoup multipart response parsingmultipart http response34Monitor
- CVE-2026-0719194 days apartLibsoup: signed to unsigned conversion error leading to stack-based buffer overflow in libsoup ntlm authentication34Monitor
- CVE-2026-4395850 days apartRrdtool: rrdtool: stack buffer overflow allows local code execution or denial of service31Monitor
- CVE-2026-5969212 days apartGstreamer1-plugins-bad-free: gstreamer: dtls certificate subject dn stack buffer overflow in openssl_verify_callback30Monitor
- CVE-2026-162771 days apartRpcbind: rpcbind: stack buffer overflow in rpcinfo rpcbaddrlist()26Monitor
- CVE-2025-12464263 days apartQemu-kvm: stack buffer overflow in e1000 device via short frames in loopback mode24Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-121 · Stack-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.