CVE-2026-104715: Cifs-utils: mount.cifs credential-file option injection allows local privilege boundary bypass
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.26% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 cifs-utils 7.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 7.9-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 cifs-utils 7.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 7.9-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in cifs-utils. This flaw allows an unprivileged local user to achieve privilege escalation. When a privileged service mounts a Common Internet File System (CIFS) share using a user-controlled credentials file, input values are not properly sanitized before being assembled into mount options. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability to inject unauthorized mount options, allowing them to bypass permission checks and execute files with administrative (root) privileges.
- Published
- Oct 16, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 18th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-88
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.21 | cifs-utils | before 7.1-r1 | 7.1-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | cifs-utils | before 7.3-r1 | 7.3-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.23 | cifs-utils | before 7.4-r1 | 7.4-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.24 | cifs-utils | before 7.5-r1 | 7.5-r1 |
| Debian:12 | cifs-utils | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | cifs-utils | before 2:7.4-1+deb13u1 | 2:7.4-1+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | cifs-utils | before 2:7.9-1 | 2:7.9-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | cifs-utils | before 7.4-160000.3.1 | 7.4-160000.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | cifs-utils | before 6.15-150400.3.27.1 | 6.15-150400.3.27.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | cifs-utils | before 6.9-13.32.2 | 6.9-13.32.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | cifs-utils | before 7.0-159998.1.1 | 7.0-159998.1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | cifs-utils | before 7.4-160000.3.1 | 7.4-160000.3.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-109968Oct 14, 2026 · Clevis: clevis: pkcs#11 luks passphrase logged in plaintext to world-readable file22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-110777Oct 14, 2026 · Evolution-data-server: local file disclosure via attach file:// uris22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-111555Oct 16, 2026 · Luksmeta: missing slot-range validation permits out-of-gap device i/o24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 cifs-utils 7.7-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 7.9-1 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| alpine:cifs-utils | 7.1-r1 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:cifs-utils | 2:7.4-1+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cifs-utils | 7.4-160000.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cifs-utils | 6.15-150400.3.27.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cifs-utils | 7.0-159998.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-10-15 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-1 d
- Published
- Fix recorded+1 d
- TodayNov 13, 2026+29 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-12567225 days apartCockpit: cockpit-storaged: tang keyserver address from an untrusted luks header clevis token reaches curl's argument vector as an option26Monitor
- CVE-2026-1115810 days apartLibblockdev: libblockdev: argument injection in ntfs/vfat label-setting helpers via udisks2 setlabel() d-bus method13Monitor
- CVE-2026-10532611 days apartCups: cups: argument injection in mailto notifier via notify-recipient-uri10Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-88 · Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Parameter InjectionCAPEC-137likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Flash Parameter InjectionCAPEC-174likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Meta-characters in E-mail Headers to Inject Malicious PayloadsCAPEC-41likelihood: High · High
- HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP)CAPEC-460Medium
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
- Exploit maturity— → poc
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.