CVE-2025-6032: Podman: podman missing tls verification
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.51% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: github.com/containers/podman/ podman 5.5.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/containers/podman/ podman 5.5.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Podman. The podman machine init command fails to verify the TLS certificate when downloading the VM images from an OCI registry. This issue results in a Man In The Middle attack.
- BDU:2025-09074
- GHSA-65gg-3w2w-hr4h
- ALSA-2025:10549
- ALSA-2025:10550
- ALSA-2025:10551
- GO-2025-3777
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15262-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:20305-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21244-1
- RHSA-2025:10295
- RHSA-2025:10549
- RHSA-2025:10550
- RHSA-2025:10551
- RHSA-2025:10668
- RHSA-2025:9726
- RHSA-2025:9751
- RHSA-2025:9766
- RLSA-2025:10549
- RLSA-2025:10550
- RLSA-2025:10551
- Published
- Jun 24, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 12, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 43th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 33 / 40 · 8.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 8.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
github.com/containers/podman/ podman
- 4.8.0 and later · before 5.5.2affected · semver
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 6:5.4.0-12.el10_0 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 8100020250625105344.afee755d and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 5:5.4.0-12.el9_6 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
- 4:4.9.4-18.el9_4.2 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16
- 4:4.9.4-14.rhaos4.16.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 416.94.202507222002-0 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17
- 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 417.94.202507132309-0 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18
- 418.94.202507221927-0 and laternot affected · rpm
- 5:5.2.2-9.rhaos4.18.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19
- 4.19.9.6.202507152218-0 and laternot affected · rpm
- 5:5.4.0-6.rhaos4.19.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20
- 4.20.9.6.202509251656-0 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | podman-docker | before 6:5.4.0-12.el10_0 | 6:5.4.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah | before 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah | before 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah-tests | before 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah-tests | before 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | cockpit-podman | before 84.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 | 84.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | conmon | before 3:2.1.10-1.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 | 3:2.1.10-1.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | container-selinux | before 2:2.229.0-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 | 2:2.229.0-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containernetworking-plugins | before 1:1.4.0-6.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 | 1:1.4.0-6.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containernetworking-plugins | before 1:1.4.0-6.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 | 1:1.4.0-6.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containers-common | before 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 | 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containers-common | before 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 | 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containers-common | before 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3876+e55593a8 | 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3876+e55593a8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | containers-common | before 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 | 2:1-82.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | crit | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3845+87b84552 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3845+87b84552 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | crit | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3858+6ad51f9f | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3858+6ad51f9f |
| AlmaLinux:8 | crit | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | criu | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | criu | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3876+e55593a8 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3876+e55593a8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | criu | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | criu | before 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3926+f12484f5 | 3.18-5.module_el8.10.0+3926+f12484f5 |
+96
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10230Samba: command injection in wins server hook script52Plan
- CVE-2026-4631Cockpit: cockpit: unauthenticated remote code execution due to ssh command-line argument injection44Plan
- CVE-2026-76578Ipa: freeipa: freeipa: unauthenticated ldap client can obtain administrator credentials via the self-managed-token aci39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-6020Jun 17, 2025 · Linux-pam: linux-pam directory traversal31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-6019Jun 19, 2025 · Libblockdev: lpe from allow_active to root in libblockdev via udisks28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-7345Jul 8, 2025 · Gdk‑pixbuf: heap‑buffer‑overflow in gdk‑pixbuf30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/containers/podman/ podman | 5.5.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| almalinux:aardvark-dns | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:buildah | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4023+db236c53 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:buildah-tests | 2:1.33.12-2.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:cockpit-podman | 84.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:conmon | 3:2.1.10-1.module_el8.10.0+3970+8445edf6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:container-selinux | 2:2.229.0-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:containernetworking-plugins | 1:1.4.0-6.module_el8.10.0+4016+efd18bf8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman | 5:5.4.0-12.el9_6 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-docker | 6:5.4.0-12.el10_0 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-plugins | 5:5.4.0-12.el9_6 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-remote | 5:5.4.0-12.el9_6 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-tests | 5:5.4.0-12.el9_6 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:podman | 5.4.2+ds1-2 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:github.com/containers/podman/v5 | 5.5.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:podman | 4.9.5-150500.3.46.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-catatonit | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-catatonit-debuginfo | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-debuginfo | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-debugsource | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-docker | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-gvproxy | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-gvproxy-debuginfo | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-plugins | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-plugins-debuginfo | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-remote | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:podman-remote-debuginfo | 5:5.2.2-8.rhaos4.17.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.17::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:aardvark-dns | 2:1.10.1-2.module+el8.10.0+1874+ce489889 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:buildah | 2:1.33.12-2.module+el8.10.0+2001+6a33db9f · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
+12
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-42013336 days apartGnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to oversized subject alternative name32Monitor
- CVE-2026-42011317 days apartGnutls: gnutls: security bypass due to incorrect name constraint handling29Monitor
- CVE-2026-42012336 days apartGnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to improper handling of uri and srv sans28Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (16 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10549
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10550
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10551
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10668
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11359
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11363
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11677
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11681
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15397
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9726
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9751
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9766
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6032
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372501
- github.com/containers/podman/commit/726b506acc8a00d99f1a3a1357ecf619a1f798c3
- github.com/containers/podman/security/advisories/GHSA-65gg-3w2w-hr4h
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.