CVE-2026-34978: OpenPrinting CUPS: Path traversal in RSS notify-recipient-uri enables file write outside CacheDir/rss (and clobbering of job.cache)
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.42% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: azl3 cups 2.4.16-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.4.17-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 cups 2.4.16-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.4.17-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
OpenPrinting CUPS is an open source printing system for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. In versions 2.4.16 and prior, the RSS notifier allows .. path traversal in notify-recipient-uri (e.g., rss:///../job.cache), letting a remote IPP client write RSS XML bytes outside CacheDir/rss (anywhere that is lp-writable). In particular, because CacheDir is group-writable by default (typically root:lp and mode 0770), the notifier (running as lp) can replace root-managed state files via temp-file + rename(). This PoC clobbers CacheDir/job.cache with RSS XML, and after restarting cupsd the scheduler fails to parse the job cache and previously queued jobs disappear. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
- Published
- Apr 3, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 20, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 36th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openprinting | cups | cpe:2.3:a:openprinting:cups |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openprinting cupsup to 2.4.16 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenPrinting cups
- <= 2.4.16affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.20 | cups | before 2.4.18-r0 | 2.4.18-r0 |
| Debian:12 | cups | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | cups | before 2.4.17-1 | 2.4.17-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | cups | before 2.4.17-1.1 | 2.4.17-1.1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-client | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-devel | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-filesystem | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-ipptool | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-libs | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-lpd | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | cups-printerapp | before 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | cups | before 2.2.7-150000.3.93.1 | 2.2.7-150000.3.93.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 | cups | before 1.7.5-20.67.1 | 1.7.5-20.67.1 |
Same product
openprinting: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-58060cups has Authentication bypass with AuthType Negotiate32Monitor
- CVE-2023-4504OpenPrinting CUPS/libppd Postscript Parsing Heap Overflow28Monitor
- CVE-2023-34241CUPS vulnerable to use-after-free in cupsdAcceptClient()28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-61915Nov 29, 2025 · OpenPrinting CUPS vulnerable to stack based out-of-bound write26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-27447Apr 3, 2026 · OpenPrinting CUPS: Authorization bypass via case-insensitive group-member lookup25Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34979Apr 3, 2026 · OpenPrinting CUPS: Heap overflow in `get_options()`21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 cups 2.4.16-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.4.17-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| alpine:cups | 2.4.18-r0 · Alpine:v3.20 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:cups | 2.4.17-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:cups | 2.4.17-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-client | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-devel | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-filesystem | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-ipptool | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-libs | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-lpd | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cups-printerapp | 0:2.4.17-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:cups | 1.7.5-20.67.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-61702195 days apartOpenPrinting CUPS: root-side banner file disclosure21Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →