Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA Linux

CVE-2026-99218: coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: Linux Linux 0fce73efee40c65ce26641c5d93942462f9e8307, 16e94ed90b1b02398e044d41fd1db34828daa08e, 61d58591aa0188bf2463e263962256316ff8b576.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 0fce73efee40c65ce26641c5d93942462f9e8307, 16e94ed90b1b02398e044d41fd1db34828daa08e, 61d58591aa0188bf2463e263962256316ff8b576 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads coredump_finish() releases the parked threads by clearing ->task in their core_thread entry and calling wake_up_process() on each of them. It does that without holding a reference on the task and without being inside rcu. But calling wake_up_process(task) without rcu here isn't safe. A parked thread doesn't need that wakeup to leave. A spurious wakeup or a preemption after the store is enough for the task to go away. So if the coredump client is preempted between the store and wake_up_process() the thread can exit and be freed in the meantime and try_to_wake_up() takes pi_lock in freed memory. Hold rcu across the loop.

HighCVSS 7.0 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 2, 2026
Updated
Nov 3, 2026
EPSS
0.1% · 2th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
28 / 40 · 7.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.1%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · Linux
7.0
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-99218

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Linux Linux

    • 2.6.27affected
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before fd0fbe84312fda2fc187428c92c50b7d03a9d24caffected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before 71146c437bae59e5280f657965dc6d006ee3989baffected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before 0fce73efee40c65ce26641c5d93942462f9e8307affected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before 16e94ed90b1b02398e044d41fd1db34828daa08eaffected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before a0f09ff4c6b93312e565cfe75d76c3a551a3ec4caffected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before b0eca0edddf4c1dbaf6d1f6a8636b4235f5bc573affected · git
    • a94e2d408eaedbd85aae259621d46fafc10479a2 and later · before 61d58591aa0188bf2463e263962256316ff8b576affected · git
    • before 2.6.27not affected · semver
    • 6.1.191 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxfrom 0—
Debian:13linuxbefore 6.12.115-16.12.115-1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation
    40Plan
  • CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment
    40Plan
  • CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-99215Oct 28, 2026 · power: supply: core: prevent unregistering a power supply while a callback runs
    0Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-99216Oct 28, 2026 · Drivers: hv: Don't reset VMBus connection state on error/exit paths
    33Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-99219Nov 2, 2026 · ftrace: Initialize modname and offset in print_rec()
    0Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Linux Linux0fce73efee40c65ce26641c5d93942462f9e8307Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux16e94ed90b1b02398e044d41fd1db34828daa08eVendor (CNA)
Linux Linux61d58591aa0188bf2463e263962256316ff8b576Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux71146c437bae59e5280f657965dc6d006ee3989bVendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxa0f09ff4c6b93312e565cfe75d76c3a551a3ec4cVendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxb0eca0edddf4c1dbaf6d1f6a8636b4235f5bc573Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxfd0fbe84312fda2fc187428c92c50b7d03a9d24cVendor (CNA)
debian:linux6.12.115-1 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. Fix recordedsame day
  3. TodayNov 6, 2026+4 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓
  2. Exploit maturity— → none

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records