CVE-2026-9076: Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.70% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 52.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.21, 3.4.6, 3.5.7; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-18; azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-3.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.21, 3.4.6, 3.5.7; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-18; azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key(). Impact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information disclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker. The key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the RFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped key length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the block length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from an OID carried in the attacker's PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no requirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects a stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer containing the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes specified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen. Applications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password() (equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS data are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the over-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication succeeds. The over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so there is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the allocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal allocator. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
- BDU:2026-16131
- ALSA-2026:25237
- ALSA-2026:25239
- openSUSE-SU-2026:11023-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:21005-1
- RHSA-2026:25237
- RHSA-2026:25239
- RHSA-2026:42825
- RHSA-2026:62790
- RHSA-2026:67551
- RLSA-2026:25237
- RLSA-2026:25239
- SUSE-SU-2026:22100-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:22132-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:22251-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:22315-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:2392-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:2393-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:2396-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:2397-1
- Published
- Jun 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 52th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl openssl1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zq
- openssl openssl1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zh
- openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.21
- openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6
- openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7
- openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3
- openssl openssl4.0.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.1affected · semver
- 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.3affected · semver
- 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.7affected · semver
- 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.6affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.21affected · semver
- 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zhaffected
- 1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zqaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | openssl | from 1.0.2 · before 3.3.7-r1 | 3.3.7-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | openssl | from 1.0.2 · before 3.5.7-r0 | 3.5.7-r0 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 | 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.5.6-1~deb13u2 | 3.5.6-1~deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | openssl | before 3.6.3-1 | 3.6.3-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | openssl-3 | before 3.5.0-160000.8.1 | 3.5.0-160000.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.5.3-6.1 | 3.5.3-6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-libs-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 | 1:3.5.5-4.el9_8 |
+30
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-45447Jun 9, 2026 · Heap Use-After-Free in the PKCS7_verify() Function36Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-7383Jun 9, 2026 · Possible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-54876Aug 5, 2026 · Client-Side Memory Leak in OCSP Response Checking30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.21 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.4.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.5.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.6.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 4.0.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-17 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-18 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 openssl 3.3.5-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.3.7-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.3.7-r1 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.20-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.5.3-6.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:chunkah | 0:0.6.0-3.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debugsource | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4 | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-bundled-gems | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-default-gems | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-devel | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:openssl | 1:3.5.5-4.el10_2 · Rocky Linux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-1_0_0 | 1.0.2p-3.109.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-1_1 | 1.1.1w-150700.11.22.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-3 | 3.1.4-14.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)reporter
- Bhabani Sankar Dasreporter
- Nikola Pajkovskyremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-84782112 days apartDTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset32Monitor
- CVE-2026-341800 days apartHeap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing30Monitor
- CVE-2026-2838663 days apartOut-of-bounds Read in AES-CFB-128 on X86-64 with AVX-512 Support30Monitor
- CVE-2025-9230252 days apartOut-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap30Monitor
- CVE-2026-427710 days apartPossible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email()24Monitor
- CVE-2025-9232252 days apartOut-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling24Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-0355 · Jun 10, 2026(OpenSSL Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3d8d5bc1056b2f62da9fede23fedbf47e85187b0
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/715349a1d7c6db970e6815dafb90915f07307f98
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/77bf00ab13f6ff5e516535432f0328ed70ec0c26
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eecbe330977e8d023aae1ca2d9bdbe983ef3fdc6
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.