CVE-2026-84782: DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.90% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.23, 3.4.8, 3.5.9; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-20 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-21; azl3 openssl 3.3.7-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.23, 3.4.8, 3.5.9; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-20 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-21; azl3 openssl 3.3.7-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.3.7-7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue summary: The DTLS retransmission logic does not correctly handle a handshake message write that is suspended part-way through. The retransmitted message can be read past the message buffer and the retransmission overwrites the internal state the suspended write needs to resume correctly. Impact summary: The retransmitted message can disclose a heap memory to the peer as plaintext handshake data or cause a crash and a Denial of Service when the read reaches an unmapped memory region. CWE: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read Description: DTLS handshake messages can be written out in multiple fragments, and a write can suspend mid-message (returning WANT_WRITE) if the underlying transport temporarily cannot accept more data. While such a write is suspended, the DTLS retransmission timer may independently fire and ask the retransmission logic to resend an earlier, already-acknowledged-as-sent message from its retransmit queue. The retransmission logic reused the same internal buffer and position tracking as the message that was still being written, without resetting the position back to the start of the message being retransmitted. As a result the retransmission was read starting from wherever the suspended write had left off, producing a mislabelled message whose body was leftover bytes from the other, larger message still in flight - content that was never meant to be sent at that point, and which could run past the end of the allocated buffer. Separately, even when the retransmission is positioned correctly, allowing it to run to completion while another write is suspended overwrites the same shared bookkeeping that the suspended write depends on to resume. When the application later resumes the suspended write (via a subsequent SSL_read(), SSL_write(), SSL_accept(), or SSL_connect() call), it finds that bookkeeping in a state inconsistent with the message and aborts the process in a debugging build. The fix resets the retransmission's read position to the start of the message before resending, and skips retransmission entirely whenever a handshake write is still suspended, deferring to the next call that resumes it instead. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.
- EUVD-2026-89013
- ALSA-2026:76918
- ALSA-2026:77396
- ALSA-2026:80510
- ALSA-2026:80514
- ALSA-2026:85968
- openSUSE-SU-2026:22102-1
- RHSA-2026:62790
- RHSA-2026:67551
- RHSA-2026:73496
- RHSA-2026:74162
- RHSA-2026:74166
- RHSA-2026:76918
- RHSA-2026:77396
- RHSA-2026:80510
- RHSA-2026:80514
- RLSA-2026:76918
- RLSA-2026:77396
- RLSA-2026:80510
- RLSA-2026:80514
- Published
- Sep 29, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 10, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 60th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
32
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your server's TLS configurationRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.3affected · semver
- 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.5affected · semver
- 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.9affected · semver
- 3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.8affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.23affected · semver
- 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zjaffected
- 1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zsaffected
Affected versions · NVD (7)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl openssl1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zs
- openssl openssl1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zj
- openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.23
- openssl openssl3.4.0 and later · before 3.4.8
- openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.9
- openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.5
- openssl openssl4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.3
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | compat-openssl10 | before 1:1.0.2o-4.el8_10.4 | 1:1.0.2o-4.el8_10.4 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl | before 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-devel | before 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-libs | before 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-perl | before 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-18.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | compat-openssl11 | before 1:1.1.1k-5.el9_8.6 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el9_8.6 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-2.el9_8 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | openssl | from 1.0.2 · before 3.3.7-r2 | 3.3.7-r2 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.22-1~deb12u2 | 3.0.22-1~deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.5.7-1~deb13u3 | 3.5.7-1~deb13u3 |
| Debian:14 | openssl | before 3.6.5-1 | 3.6.5-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | openssl-3 | before 3.5.0-160000.11.1 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2 |
+59
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-75806Sep 29, 2026 · Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-77696Sep 29, 2026 · Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation14Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-84783Sep 29, 2026 · Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.23 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.4.8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.5.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.6.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 4.0.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-20 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-21 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 openssl 3.3.7-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.3.7-7 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:compat-openssl10 | 1:1.0.2o-4.el8_10.4 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:compat-openssl11 | 1:1.1.1k-5.el9_8.6 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.5.8-2.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.3.7-r2 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.22-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.5.7-1~deb13u3 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.5.0-160000.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bootupd | 0:0.3.2-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:chunkah | 0:0.7.0-1.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-config-fips | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 0:3.5.9-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4 | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-bundled-gems | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-default-gems | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-devel | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-doc | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ruby3.4-libs | 0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rust-bootupd | 0:0.3.2-1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:compat-openssl10 | 1:1.0.2o-4.el8_10.4 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
+9
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+45 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Laurent Gaffie (secorizon.com)reporter
- Ryan Hooperremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-9230364 days apartOut-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap40Plan
- CVE-2026-34180112 days apartHeap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing30Monitor
- CVE-2026-9076112 days apartOut-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption30Monitor
- CVE-2026-28386175 days apartOut-of-bounds Read in AES-CFB-128 on X86-64 with AVX-512 Support30Monitor
- CVE-2026-42771112 days apartPossible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email()24Monitor
- CVE-2025-9232364 days apartOut-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling24Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
- CVSS— → 8.2
- Severity— → high
- SSVC exploitation— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9f6b34422af7eb5dac61322e33dac1ae989fa628
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a383dafdd754eb5b22bf45e37e1bff9d07277a58
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d951e02ede8f6a6ff8150546db44b34f0518192c
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-457936.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.