CVE-2026-70642: ToolJet < 3.21.94 Authorization Bypass via app-environments/init
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ToolJet ToolJet 3.21.94.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ToolJet ToolJet 3.21.94 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
ToolJet before 3.21.94, fixed in commit e5f387a, contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the app environments init endpoint that allows authenticated users to read app version metadata belonging to other workspaces. Attackers can send GET requests to /api/app-environments/init with an editing_version_id from another workspace to retrieve the version name, description, status, current environment ID, and app ID, because the lookup is not scoped to the caller's organization.
- Published
- Nov 12, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 12, 2026
- EPSS
- —
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · —
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ToolJet ToolJet
- before 3.21.94affected · semver
Same product
tooljet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-82874ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db37Monitor
- CVE-2026-55413ToolJet - Marketplace Plugin Poisoning Enables Instance-Wide Remote Code Execution37Monitor
- CVE-2026-54344ToolJet GitHub Actions comment body shell injection exposes deployment secrets35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-82873Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet through 3.0.0-ee-beta.2 Cross-workspace Schema Disclosure via Export21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-82875Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet before v3.16.208 Authorization Bypass via organizationId20Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-118685Oct 28, 2026 · ToolJet 3.20.2-lts before 3.20.242-lts Signup Bypass via SignupDisableGuard27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ToolJet ToolJet | 3.21.94 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+1 d
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- CayConfinder
- piropatriotfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-8287473 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db37Monitor
- CVE-2026-8286973 days apartToolJet Database before v3.16.44 Privilege Escalation via join_tables32Monitor
- CVE-2026-8287073 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Database Manipulation28Monitor
- CVE-2026-8287273 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Workspace Authorization Bypass28Monitor
- CVE-2026-55411140 days apartToolJet: Cross-tenant credential decryption (IDOR) in POST /api/data-sources/decrypt — any authenticated user can decrypt any organization's data-source…27Monitor
- CVE-2026-7306893 days apartToolJet: Cross-tenant Broken Access Control in ToolJet Database (tooljet-db): any authenticated user can read and write another organization's tables23Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (2)
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.