CVE-2026-82872: ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Workspace Authorization Bypass
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.51% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: ToolJet ToolJet 3.16.208.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ToolJet ToolJet 3.16.208 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
ToolJet before v3.16.208 fails to validate that the path organizationId matches the authenticated user's workspace before performing ToolJet DB table operations. A workspace admin can create, view, and delete database tables in another workspace by replacing the organizationId parameter in table-management API requests.
- Published
- Aug 31, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 43th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 7.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ToolJet ToolJet
- 3.16.208not affected
- before 3.16.208affected · semver
Same product
tooljet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-82874ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db37Monitor
- CVE-2026-55413ToolJet - Marketplace Plugin Poisoning Enables Instance-Wide Remote Code Execution37Monitor
- CVE-2026-54344ToolJet GitHub Actions comment body shell injection exposes deployment secrets35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-82870Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Database Manipulation28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-82871Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Organization Data Read via Database Routes32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-82873Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet through 3.0.0-ee-beta.2 Cross-workspace Schema Disclosure via Export21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ToolJet ToolJet | 3.16.208 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- owen050724finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-828740 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db37Monitor
- CVE-2026-828690 days apartToolJet Database before v3.16.44 Privilege Escalation via join_tables32Monitor
- CVE-2026-828700 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Database Manipulation28Monitor
- CVE-2026-5541167 days apartToolJet: Cross-tenant credential decryption (IDOR) in POST /api/data-sources/decrypt — any authenticated user can decrypt any organization's data-source secrets27Monitor
- CVE-2026-7306820 days apartToolJet: Cross-tenant Broken Access Control in ToolJet Database (tooljet-db): any authenticated user can read and write another organization's tables23Monitor
- CVE-2026-828730 days apartToolJet through 3.0.0-ee-beta.2 Cross-workspace Schema Disclosure via Export21Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.