Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-73068· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

ToolJet: Cross-tenant Broken Access Control in ToolJet Database (tooljet-db): any authenticated user can read and write another organization's tables

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 23/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.27% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: ToolJet ToolJet 3.20.207-lts.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to ToolJet ToolJet 3.20.207-lts or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

ToolJet is the open-source foundation am AI-native platform for building and deploying internal tools, workflows and AI agents. Prior to 3.20.207, the ToolJet Database HTTP API in server/src/modules/tooljet-db/controller.ts authorizes operations against the :organizationId URL path value without verifying that the caller belongs to that organization. JwtAuthGuard validates the tj-workspace-id header against the caller's memberships, while server/src/modules/tooljet-db/ability/index.ts grants VIEW_TABLES, VIEW_TABLE, and JOIN_TABLES without binding them to the path organization. An authenticated user can set tj-workspace-id to the user's own workspace and target another workspace through GET /api/tooljet-db/organizations/:organizationId/tables, GET /api/tooljet-db/organizations/:organizationId/table/:tableName, POST /api/tooljet-db/organizations/:organizationId/join, and the related table-management routes, allowing disclosure of table names, schemas, and rows and allowing tables to be created, altered, bulk populated, or dropped across tenant boundaries. This issue is fixed in version 3.20.207-lts.

MediumCVSS 5.9 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Aug 11, 2026
Updated
Sep 9, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 18th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

23

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
23 / 40 · 5.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
5.9
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-73068

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for tooljet records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ToolJet ToolJet

    • 3.20.207-ltsaffected

Same product

tooljet: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-82874ToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-55413ToolJet - Marketplace Plugin Poisoning Enables Instance-Wide Remote Code Execution
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-54344ToolJet GitHub Actions comment body shell injection exposes deployment secrets
    35Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-55411Jun 25, 2026 · ToolJet: Cross-tenant credential decryption (IDOR) in POST /api/data-sources/decrypt — any authenticated user can decrypt any organization's data-source secrets
    27Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-55412Jun 25, 2026 · ToolJet Cloud - SSRF to Azure Cloud Infrastructure Compromise
    33Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-82869Aug 31, 2026 · ToolJet Database before v3.16.44 Privilege Escalation via join_tables
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
ToolJet ToolJet3.20.207-lts · descriptionVendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-8287420 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Authorization Bypass via tooljet-db
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8286920 days apartToolJet Database before v3.16.44 Privilege Escalation via join_tables
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8287020 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Tenant Database Manipulation
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8287220 days apartToolJet before v3.16.208 Cross-Workspace Authorization Bypass
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2026-5541147 days apartToolJet: Cross-tenant credential decryption (IDOR) in POST /api/data-sources/decrypt — any authenticated user can decrypt any organization's data-source secrets
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8287320 days apartToolJet through 3.0.0-ee-beta.2 Cross-workspace Schema Disclosure via Export
    21Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
  • Administrator privileges are required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
low · data can be read
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
Low
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
Low

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-639 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);res.json(invoice);

Fixed

ts
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({  id: req.params.id,  ownerId: req.user.id,});if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);res.json(invoice);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (3 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records