Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-58227· NVD / CVE Program· CNA EEF

TLS/DTLS denial of service via unbounded recursion on cross-signed peer certificate chain

The Erlang/OTP ssl application does not detect cycles when reconstructing an incomplete peer certificate chain during a TLS or DTLS handshake. In ssl_certificate:handle_incomplete_chain/5, the received chain is passed to ssl_certificate:build_certificate_chain/5, which walks issuer relationships via ssl_certificate:do_certificate_chain/7 with no cycle detection and no depth limit. When the peer supplies two mutually cross-signed certificates in unordered form (A issues B, B issues A), the issuer lookup alternates between the two certificates and the pair of functions recurses indefinitely, growing the call stack and chain accumulator without bound. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted certificate chain in a TLS or DTLS Certificate handshake message to exhaust available memory and crash the BEAM node. Only a TCP connection and a partial handshake are required; no authentication or completed handshake is needed, and both TLS/DTLS servers and clients are affected when processing peer certificate messages. This issue affects OTP from OTP 23.2 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to ssl from 10.2 before 11.7.4, 11.6.0.4 and 11.2.12.11.

HighCVSS 8.7 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 27, 2026
Updated
Aug 10, 2026
EPSS
0.7% · 50th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

34

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
34 / 40 · 8.7 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · EEF
8.7
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
erlangerlang\/otp
erlangerlang\/ssl

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • erlang erlang/otp23.2 and later · before 27.3.4.15
  • erlang erlang/otp28.0 and later · before 28.5.0.4
  • erlang erlang/otp29.0 and later · before 29.0.4
  • erlang erlang/ssl10.2 and later · before 11.2.12.11
  • erlang erlang/ssl11.3 and later · before 11.6.0.4
  • erlang erlang/ssl11.7 and later · before 11.7.4

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Erlang OTP

    • 10.2 and lateraffected · otpfixed in 11.7.4, 11.6.0.4, 11.2.12.11
    • 23.2 and lateraffected · otpfixed in 29.0.4, 28.5.0.4, 27.3.4.15
    • addc42df113f8f15fc20e9dff45490b3ce0d3d6b and lateraffected · gitfixed in 7db64720177961e04545681480d691c4be81c54d, 241d43703989fec4b6bf637beaeb366d92dcc4c2, 0307bff2c72b685c6bd952daaac6bd661c247d62

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12erlangall versions—
Debian:13erlangbefore 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u31:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3
Debian:14erlangbefore 1:29.0.4+dfsg-11:29.0.4+dfsg-1
openSUSE:Tumbleweederlang27before 27.1.3-3.127.1.3-3.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7erlangbefore 23.3.4.19-150300.3.39.123.3.4.19-150300.3.39.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7erlang26before 26.2.1-150300.7.28.126.2.1-150300.7.28.1

Same product

erlang: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-32433Erlang/OTP SSH Vulnerable to Pre-Authentication RCEKEV
    100Now
  • CVE-2022-37026In Erlang/OTP before 23.3.4.15, 24.x before 24.3.4.2, and 25.x before 25.0.2, there is a Client Authentication Bypass in certain client-cert
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2016-10253An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP 18.x.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-55953TLS 1.2 and DTLS client accepts unoffered anonymous cipher suite, bypassing server authentication
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-49759Stack buffer overflow in SCTP error cause parsing in inet_drv allows remote VM crash
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2026-59251Denial of service via exponential certificate policy tree growth in path validation
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Erlang OTP0307bff2c72b685c6bd952daaac6bd661c247d62Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP11.2.12.11Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP11.6.0.4Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP11.7.4Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP241d43703989fec4b6bf637beaeb366d92dcc4c2Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP27.3.4.15Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP28.5.0.4Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP29.0.4Vendor (CNA)
Erlang OTP7db64720177961e04545681480d691c4be81c54dVendor (CNA)
Debian:erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
openSUSE:erlang2727.1.3-3.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
SUSE:erlang23.3.4.19-150300.3.39.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)
SUSE:erlang2626.2.1-150300.7.28.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-674 · Uncontrolled Recursion

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records