CVE-2026-55953: TLS 1.2 and DTLS client accepts unoffered anonymous cipher suite, bypassing server authentication
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Erlang OTP 064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b, 0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c, 11.2.12.11; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-3.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Erlang OTP 064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b, 0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c, 11.2.12.11; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.21-3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected. An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.
- Published
- Jul 27, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-757
Report tools
Action score
36
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · EEF
- 9.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| erlang | erlang/otp | cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/otp |
| erlang | erlang/ssl | cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/ssl |
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Erlang OTP
- before 17.0unknown · otp
- 17.0 and later · before 27.3.4.15affected · otp
- 28.0 and later · before 28.5.0.4affected · otp
- 29.0 and later · before 29.0.4affected · otp
- before 5.3.4unknown · otp
- 5.3.4 and later · before 11.2.12.11affected · otp
- 11.3 and later · before 11.6.0.4affected · otp
- 11.7 and later · before 11.7.4affected · otp
- 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 and lateraffected · gitfixed in 064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b, 0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c, e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77
Affected versions · NVD (6)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- erlang erlang/otp17.0 and later · before 27.3.4.15
- erlang erlang/otp28.0 and later · before 28.5.0.4
- erlang erlang/otp29.0 and later · before 29.0.4
- erlang erlang/ssl5.3.4 and later · before 11.2.12.11
- erlang erlang/ssl11.3 and later · before 11.6.0.4
- erlang erlang/ssl11.7 and later · before 11.7.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | erlang | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | erlang | before 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3 | 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3 |
| Debian:14 | erlang | before 1:29.0.4+dfsg-1 | 1:29.0.4+dfsg-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | erlang27 | before 27.1.3-3.1 | 27.1.3-3.1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27 | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-asn1 | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-common_test | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-compiler | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-crypto | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-debugger | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-dialyzer | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-diameter | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-edoc | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-eldap | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-erl_interface | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-erts | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-et | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-eunit | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-examples | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-ftp | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-gdb-tools | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-inets | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-jinterface | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | erlang27-kernel | before 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 |
+21
Same product
erlang: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-49759Stack buffer overflow in SCTP error cause parsing in inet_drv allows remote VM crash35Monitor
- CVE-2026-59251Denial of service via exponential certificate policy tree growth in path validation34Monitor
- CVE-2026-58227TLS/DTLS denial of service via unbounded recursion on cross-signed peer certificate chain34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-42792Jul 27, 2026 · epmd permanent DoS via EMFILE on accept(2) in erts25Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-54890Jul 27, 2026 · BEAM VM crash via integer underflow in binary_to_term BIT_BINARY_EXT decoding32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-55737Jul 27, 2026 · Heap pointer corruption via signed/unsigned mismatch in LARGE_TUPLE_EXT decoding in erts external term format decoder20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Erlang OTP | 064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 11.2.12.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 11.6.0.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 11.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 27.3.4.15 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 28.5.0.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | 29.0.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Erlang OTP | e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 erlang 26.2.5.21-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 26.2.5.21-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:erlang | 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:erlang27 | 27.1.3-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-asn1 | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-common_test | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-compiler | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-crypto | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-debugger | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-dialyzer | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-diameter | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-edoc | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-eldap | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-erl_interface | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:erlang27-erts | 0:27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:erlang | 23.3.4.19-150300.3.39.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:erlang26 | 26.2.1-150300.7.28.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Ingela Anderton Andinremediation developer
- Jakub Witczakremediation reviewer
- Jonatan Männchen / EEFfinder
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-0662 · Jul 28, 2026(Erlang/OTP Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Not on record for this CVE: variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-757 · Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- github.com/erlang/otp/commit/064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b
- github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c
- github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77
- github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882
- osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55953
- www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.