Denial of Service via Malicious JSON Payloads in Throttling Events in Multiple WSO2 Products Causing Persistent Service Disruption
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.55% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The throttling event handling mechanism in multiple WSO2 products accepts user-supplied JSON payloads without sufficient validation of their structure and content. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject malicious JSON data that can lead to a persistent denial of service condition. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can disrupt the API Gateway, preventing legitimate API traffic from being processed and impacting complete service availability. The denial of service is persistent, requiring manual intervention to restore normal operations.
- Published
- Jul 6, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 45th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-707
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · WSO2
- 8.6
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| wso2 | api control plane | cpe:2.3:a:wso2:api_control_plane |
| wso2 | api manager | cpe:2.3:a:wso2:api_manager |
| wso2 | traffic manager | cpe:2.3:a:wso2:traffic_manager |
| wso2 | universal gateway | cpe:2.3:a:wso2:universal_gateway |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- wso2 api control plane4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.55
- wso2 api control plane4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.19
- wso2 api manager4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.0.390
- wso2 api manager4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.0.254
- wso2 api manager4.2.0 and later · before 4.2.0.194
- wso2 api manager4.3.0 and later · before 4.3.0.105
- wso2 api manager4.4.0 and later · before 4.4.0.69
- wso2 api manager4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.54
- wso2 api manager4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18
- wso2 traffic manager4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.53
- wso2 traffic manager4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18
- wso2 universal gateway4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.54
- wso2 universal gateway4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (WSO2). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
WSO2 WSO2 API Control Plane
- 4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.55affected
- 4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.19affected
- 4.7.0 and later · before 4.7.0.2affected
WSO2 WSO2 API Manager
- before 3.2.0unknown
- 3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.0.470affected
- 3.2.1 and later · before 3.2.1.89affected
- 4.0.0 and later · before 4.0.0.390affected
- 4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.0.254affected
- 4.2.0 and later · before 4.2.0.194affected
- 4.3.0 and later · before 4.3.0.105affected
- 4.4.0 and later · before 4.4.0.69affected
- 4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.54affected
- 4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18affected
WSO2 WSO2 Traffic Manager
- 4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.53affected
- 4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18affected
- 4.7.0 and later · before 4.7.0.2affected
WSO2 WSO2 Universal Gateway
- 4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.0.54affected
- 4.6.0 and later · before 4.6.0.18affected
- 4.7.0 and later · before 4.7.0.2affected
Same product
wso2: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-5430Authentication Bypass via JWT Algorithm Mismatch in Multiple WSO2 Products Allows Account TakeoverKEV70This week
- CVE-2026-1728Privilege Escalation via System REST APIs in Multiple WSO2 Products Permits Admin Account Takeover39Monitor
- CVE-2025-9312Improper Certificate-Based Authentication Enforcement in Multiple WSO2 Products39Monitor
- CVE-2025-9152Improper Privilege Management in Multiple WSO2 API Manager via keymanager-operations DCR Endpoint39Monitor
- CVE-2025-10611Potential Broken Access Control in Multiple WSO2 Products via System REST APIs39Monitor
- CVE-2025-15039Account Takeover via Conditional Authentication Script Logic in Multiple WSO2 Products37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-707 · Improper NeutralizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- XML InjectionCAPEC-250likelihood: High
- Inter-component Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-276
- Data Interchange Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-277
- Web Services Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-278
- SOAP ManipulationCAPEC-279likelihood: Medium · High
- Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input FiltersCAPEC-3likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Generic Cross-Browser Cross-Domain TheftCAPEC-468Medium
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.