CVE-2026-34827: Rack: Algorithmic-Complexity DoS in Rack::Multipart::Parser
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: ruby-rack (Debian:13) 3.1.20-0+deb13u2; ruby-rack (Debian:14) 3.2.6-2; rack (RubyGems) 3.1.21, 3.2.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ruby-rack (Debian:13) 3.1.20-0+deb13u2; ruby-rack (Debian:14) 3.2.6-2; rack (RubyGems) 3.1.21, 3.2.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. From versions 3.0.0.beta1 to before 3.1.21, and 3.2.0 to before 3.2.6, Rack::Multipart::Parser#handle_mime_head parses quoted multipart parameters such as Content-Disposition: form-data; name="..." using repeated String#index searches combined with String#slice! prefix deletion. For escape-heavy quoted values, this causes super-linear processing. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted multipart/form-data request containing many parts with long backslash-escaped parameter values to trigger excessive CPU usage during multipart parsing. This results in a denial of service condition in Rack applications that accept multipart form data. This issue has been patched in versions 3.1.21 and 3.2.6.
- Published
- Apr 2, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 42th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rack | rack | cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rack rack3.0.0 and later · before 3.1.21
- rack rack3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
rack rack
- >= 3.0.0.beta1, < 3.1.21, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.6affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | ruby-rack | before 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 | 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | ruby-rack | before 3.2.6-2 | 3.2.6-2 |
| RubyGems | rack | from 3.0.0.beta1 · before 3.1.21 | 3.1.21 |
| RubyGems | rack | from 3.2.0 · before 3.2.6 | 3.2.6 |
Same product
rack: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)41Plan
- CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing31Monitor
- CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-26962Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: Header injection in multipart requests26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-32762Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34835Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: `Rack::Request` accepts invalid Host characters, enabling host allowlist bypass.26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ruby-rack | 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:rack | 3.1.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:rack | 3.2.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-342300 days apartRack: Quadratic complexity in Rack::Utils.select_best_encoding via wildcard Accept-Encoding header30Monitor
- CVE-2026-348260 days apartRack: Unbounded Range Count in get_byte_ranges Enables DoS30Monitor
- CVE-2026-348290 days apartRack: Denial of Service via Unbounded Multipart File Upload Without Content-Length30Monitor
- CVE-2025-61919174 days apartRack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing30Monitor
- CVE-2025-61770177 days apartRack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)30Monitor
- CVE-2025-61771177 days apartRack's multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.