Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2025-61771: Rack's multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.56% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: cockpit-ha-cluster (AlmaLinux:10) 0.12.1-1.el10_1.1; pcs (AlmaLinux:8) 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1; pcs-snmp (AlmaLinux:8) 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to cockpit-ha-cluster (AlmaLinux:10) 0.12.1-1.el10_1.1; pcs (AlmaLinux:8) 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1; pcs-snmp (AlmaLinux:8) 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Oct 7, 2025
Updated
Oct 19, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 46th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-61771

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
rackrack

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • rack rack3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.2
  • rack rackbefore 2.2.19
  • rack rack3.1.0 and later · before 3.1.17

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • rack rack

    • < 2.2.19, >= 3.1, < 3.1.17, >= 3.2, < 3.2.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10cockpit-ha-clusterbefore 0.12.1-1.el10_1.10.12.1-1.el10_1.1
AlmaLinux:8pcsbefore 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.10.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1
AlmaLinux:8pcs-snmpbefore 0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.10.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1
AlmaLinux:9pcsbefore 0.11.10-1.el9_7.10.11.10-1.el9_7.1
AlmaLinux:9pcs-snmpbefore 0.11.10-1.el9_7.10.11.10-1.el9_7.1
Debian:11ruby-rackbefore 2.1.4-3+deb11u42.1.4-3+deb11u4
Debian:12ruby-rackbefore 2.2.20-0+deb12u12.2.20-0+deb12u1
Debian:13ruby-rackbefore 3.1.18-1~deb13u13.1.18-1~deb13u1
Debian:14ruby-rackbefore 3.1.18-13.1.18-1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrubygem-rack-2.2before 2.2.19-1.12.2.19-1.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0cockpit-ha-clusterbefore 0:0.12.0-3.el10_0.30:0.12.0-3.el10_0.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0pcsbefore 0:0.12.0-3.el10_0.30:0.12.0-3.el10_0.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0pcs-snmpbefore 0:0.12.0-3.el10_0.30:0.12.0-3.el10_0.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1cockpit-ha-clusterbefore 0:0.12.1-1.el10_1.10:0.12.1-1.el10_1.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1pcsbefore 0:0.12.1-1.el10_1.10:0.12.1-1.el10_1.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1pcs-snmpbefore 0:0.12.1-1.el10_1.10:0.12.1-1.el10_1.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::serverpcsbefore 0:0.9.169-3.el7_9.50:0.9.169-3.el7_9.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::serverpcs-debuginfobefore 0:0.9.169-3.el7_9.50:0.9.169-3.el7_9.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::serverpcs-snmpbefore 0:0.9.169-3.el7_9.50:0.9.169-3.el7_9.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::highavailabilitypcsbefore 0:0.10.18-2.el8_10.70:0.10.18-2.el8_10.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::highavailabilitypcs-snmpbefore 0:0.10.18-2.el8_10.70:0.10.18-2.el8_10.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailabilitypcsbefore 0:0.11.9-2.el9_6.20:0.11.9-2.el9_6.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailabilitypcsbefore 0:0.11.10-1.el9_7.10:0.11.10-1.el9_7.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailabilitypcs-snmpbefore 0:0.11.10-1.el9_7.10:0.11.10-1.el9_7.1

+15

Same product

rack: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)
    41Plan
  • CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al
    31Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-59830Sep 25, 2025 · Rack QueryParser has an unsafe default allowing params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters
    30Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-61770Oct 7, 2025 · Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)
    30Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-61772Oct 7, 2025 · Rack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:cockpit-ha-cluster0.12.1-1.el10_1.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:pcs0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:pcs-snmp0.10.18-2.el8_10.7.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
debian:ruby-rack2.2.20-0+deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:rubygem-rack-2.22.2.19-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cockpit-ha-cluster0:0.12.0-3.el10_0.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:pcs0:0.11.9-2.el9_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailabilityPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pcs-debuginfo0:0.9.169-3.el7_9.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::serverPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:pcs-snmp0:0.11.9-2.el9_6.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailabilityPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:pcs0:0.11.9-2.el9_6.2 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack2.2.19Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack3.1.17Package registry (OSV)
RubyGems:rack3.2.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-617700 days apartRack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion)
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-617720 days apartRack's multipart parser buffers unbounded per-part headers, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-619193 days apartRack is vulnerable to a memory-exhaustion DoS through unbounded URL-encoded body parsing
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-5983012 days apartRack QueryParser has an unsafe default allowing params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-46727153 days apartUnbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34829177 days apartRack: Denial of Service via Unbounded Multipart File Upload Without Content-Length
    30Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records