CVE-2026-26962: Rack: Header injection in multipart requests
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: rack rack 3.2.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to rack rack 3.2.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. From version 3.2.0 to before version 3.2.6, Rack::Multipart::Parser unfolds folded multipart part headers incorrectly. When a multipart header contains an obs-fold sequence, Rack preserves the embedded CRLF in parsed parameter values such as filename or name instead of removing the folded line break during unfolding. As a result, applications that later reuse those parsed values in HTTP response headers may be vulnerable to downstream header injection or response splitting. This issue has been patched in version 3.2.6.
- Published
- Apr 2, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 24, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-93
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 4.8
- 1.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rack | rack | cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rack rack3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.6
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
rack rack
- >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.6affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | ruby-rack | before 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 | 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | ruby-rack | before 3.2.6-2 | 3.2.6-2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | rmt-server | before 3.1.0-160000.1.1 | 3.1.0-160000.1.1 |
| RubyGems | rack | from 3.2.0 · before 3.2.6 | 3.2.6 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP5 | rmt-server | before 2.27-150500.3.47.1 | 2.27-150500.3.47.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | rmt-server | before 3.1.0-160000.1.1 | 3.1.0-160000.1.1 |
Same product
rack: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)41Plan
- CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing31Monitor
- CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34830Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: Rack::Sendfile regex injection via HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING header allows arbitrary file reads through nginx30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-34831Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: Content-Length mismatch in Rack::Files error responses26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-32762Apr 2, 2026 · Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| rack rack | 3.2.6 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:ruby-rack | 3.1.20-0+deb13u2 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rmt-server | 3.1.0-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:rack | 3.2.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rmt-server | 3.1.0-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-27111394 days apartEscape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection27Monitor
- CVE-2025-25184414 days apartPossible Log Injection in Rack::CommonLogger22Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-93 · Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.