CVE-2026-31569: LoongArch: KVM: Handle the case that EIOINTC's coremap is empty
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 126053d0a685bf1f2e98db8966386f38b2336338, 2a0cbcd28ecf6e0b88fa498bebb94bd1be61a7c3, b97bd69eb0f67b5f961b304d28e9ba45e202d841.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 126053d0a685bf1f2e98db8966386f38b2336338, 2a0cbcd28ecf6e0b88fa498bebb94bd1be61a7c3, b97bd69eb0f67b5f961b304d28e9ba45e202d841 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: KVM: Handle the case that EIOINTC's coremap is empty EIOINTC's coremap in eiointc_update_sw_coremap() can be empty, currently we get a cpuid with -1 in this case, but we actually need 0 because it's similar as the case that cpuid >= 4. This fix an out-of-bounds access to kvm_arch::phyid_map::phys_map[].
- Published
- Apr 24, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 1th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Linux
- 7.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernel6.13.1 and later · before 6.18.21
- linux linux kernel6.19 and later · before 6.19.11
- linux linux kernel6.13
- linux linux kernel7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.13affected
- 3956a52bc05bd811082a3c9d2b423ee957e6fefc and later · before 126053d0a685bf1f2e98db8966386f38b2336338affected · git
- 3956a52bc05bd811082a3c9d2b423ee957e6fefc and later · before 2a0cbcd28ecf6e0b88fa498bebb94bd1be61a7c3affected · git
- 3956a52bc05bd811082a3c9d2b423ee957e6fefc and later · before b97bd69eb0f67b5f961b304d28e9ba45e202d841affected · git
- before 6.13not affected · semver
- 6.18.21 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 6.19.11 and later · up to and including 6.19.*not affected · semver
- 7.0 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.19.11-1 | 6.19.11-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe…KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-31564Apr 24, 2026 · LoongArch: KVM: Fix base address calculation in kvm_eiointc_regs_access()22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-31567Apr 24, 2026 · PM: sleep: Drop spurious WARN_ON() from pm_restore_gfp_mask()22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-31576Apr 24, 2026 · media: hackrf: fix to not free memory after the device is registered in hackrf_probe()31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 126053d0a685bf1f2e98db8966386f38b2336338 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 2a0cbcd28ecf6e0b88fa498bebb94bd1be61a7c3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | b97bd69eb0f67b5f961b304d28e9ba45e202d841 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.19.11-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.