CVE-2025-40104: ixgbevf: fix mailbox API compatibility by negotiating supported features
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.15% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 2e0aab9ddaf1428602c78f12064cd1e6ffcc4d18, 871ac1cd4ce4804defcb428cbb003fd84c415ff4, a376e29b1b196dc90b50df7e5e3947e3026300c4; azl3 kernel 6.6.112.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 6.6.117.1-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 2e0aab9ddaf1428602c78f12064cd1e6ffcc4d18, 871ac1cd4ce4804defcb428cbb003fd84c415ff4, a376e29b1b196dc90b50df7e5e3947e3026300c4; azl3 kernel 6.6.112.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 6.6.117.1-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ixgbevf: fix mailbox API compatibility by negotiating supported features There was backward compatibility in the terms of mailbox API. Various drivers from various OSes supporting 10G adapters from Intel portfolio could easily negotiate mailbox API. This convention has been broken since introducing API 1.4. Commit 0062e7cc955e ("ixgbevf: add VF IPsec offload code") added support for IPSec which is specific only for the kernel ixgbe driver. None of the rest of the Intel 10G PF/VF drivers supports it. And actually lack of support was not included in the IPSec implementation - there were no such code paths. No possibility to negotiate support for the feature was introduced along with introduction of the feature itself. Commit 339f28964147 ("ixgbevf: Add support for new mailbox communication between PF and VF") increasing API version to 1.5 did the same - it introduced code supported specifically by the PF ESX driver. It altered API version for the VF driver in the same time not touching the version defined for the PF ixgbe driver. It led to additional discrepancies, as the code provided within API 1.6 cannot be supported for Linux ixgbe driver as it causes crashes. The issue was noticed some time ago and mitigated by Jake within the commit d0725312adf5 ("ixgbevf: stop attempting IPSEC offload on Mailbox API 1.5"). As a result we have regression for IPsec support and after increasing API to version 1.6 ixgbevf driver stopped to support ESX MBX. To fix this mess add new mailbox op asking PF driver about supported features. Basing on a response determine whether to set support for IPSec and ESX-specific enhanced mailbox. New mailbox op, for compatibility purposes, must be added within new API revision, as API version of OOT PF & VF drivers is already increased to 1.6 and doesn't incorporate features negotiate op. Features negotiation mechanism gives possibility to be extended with new features when needed in the future.
- Published
- Oct 30, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 4th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Linux
- 7.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 4.20affected
- 0062e7cc955e0827a88570ed36ea511a7dcb391e and later · before 871ac1cd4ce4804defcb428cbb003fd84c415ff4affected · git
- 0062e7cc955e0827a88570ed36ea511a7dcb391e and later · before 2e0aab9ddaf1428602c78f12064cd1e6ffcc4d18affected · git
- 0062e7cc955e0827a88570ed36ea511a7dcb391e and later · before bf580112ed61736c2645a893413a04732505d4b1affected · git
- 0062e7cc955e0827a88570ed36ea511a7dcb391e and later · before a376e29b1b196dc90b50df7e5e3947e3026300c4affected · git
- 0062e7cc955e0827a88570ed36ea511a7dcb391e and later · before a7075f501bd33c93570af759b6f4302ef0175168affected · git
- before 4.20not affected · semver
- 6.1.158 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.114 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
- 6.12.55 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.158-1 | 6.1.158-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.57-1 | 6.12.57-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.17.6-1 | 6.17.6-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-40102Oct 30, 2025 · KVM: arm64: Prevent access to vCPU events before init0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-40103Oct 30, 2025 · smb: client: Fix refcount leak for cifs_sb_tlink0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-40105Oct 30, 2025 · vfs: Don't leak disconnected dentries on umount31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 2e0aab9ddaf1428602c78f12064cd1e6ffcc4d18 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 871ac1cd4ce4804defcb428cbb003fd84c415ff4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | a376e29b1b196dc90b50df7e5e3947e3026300c4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | a7075f501bd33c93570af759b6f4302ef0175168 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | bf580112ed61736c2645a893413a04732505d4b1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 kernel 6.6.112.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 6.6.117.1-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.158-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.