CVE-2024-5535: SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 38/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 5.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 92.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.15, 3.1.7, 3.2.3; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 3.3.0-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 3.3.0-2.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.15, 3.1.7, 3.2.3; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 3.3.0-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 3.3.0-2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
- BDU:2024-06988
- ALSA-2024:7848
- ALSA-2024:9333
- ALSA-2026:60329
- DLA-3942-1
- DLA-3942-2
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14219-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14220-1
- RHSA-2024:7846
- RHSA-2024:7847
- RHSA-2024:7848
- RHSA-2024:9333
- RHSA-2025:3452
- RHSA-2025:3666
- RHSA-2026:58563
- RHSA-2026:60329
- RHSA-2026:66524
- RLSA-2024:7848
- RLSA-2024:9333
- RLSA-2026:60329
- Published
- Jun 27, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 5.5% · 92th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
38
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 5.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.2affected · semver
- 3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.3affected · semver
- 3.1.0 and later · before 3.1.7affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.15affected · semver
- 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1zaaffected
- 1.0.2 and later · before 1.0.2zkaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | mingw32-openssl | before 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 | 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | mingw64-openssl | before 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 | 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl | before 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-devel | before 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-libs | before 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-perl | before 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| Alpine:v3.17 | openssl | before 3.0.14-r0 | 3.0.14-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.18 | openssl | before 3.1.6-r0 | 3.1.6-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.20 | openssl | before 3.3.1-r1 | 3.3.1-r1 |
| Debian:11 | openssl | before 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2 | 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2 |
| Debian:11 | openssl | before 1.1.1n-0+deb11u6 | 1.1.1n-0+deb11u6 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.15-1~deb12u1 | 3.0.15-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.3.2-1 | 3.3.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | openssl-1_0_0 | before 1.0.2p-150000.3.94.1 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.94.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | openssl-3 | before 3.0.8-150500.5.39.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.39.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1w-150600.5.6.1 | 1.1.1w-150600.5.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-150600.5.10.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1l-150500.17.34.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.34.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1w-11.1 | 1.1.1w-11.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-11.1 | 3.1.4-11.1 |
+87
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-6237Apr 25, 2024 · Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-4603May 16, 2024 · Excessive time spent checking DSA keys and parameters21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-6119Sep 3, 2024 · Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks50Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.15 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.1.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.2.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.3.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 3.3.0-2 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 3.3.0-2 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 1.1.1k-35 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 38.0.72.2-3 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 1.1.1k-35 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 38.0.72.2-3 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Android | 1.0.7001.0101 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for iOS | 1.1.58140101 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:mingw32-openssl | 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw64-openssl | 1.0.2k-4.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.0.14-r0 · Alpine:v3.17 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.15-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-1_0_0 | 1.0.2p-150000.3.94.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-1_1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.34.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.1.4-150600.5.10.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-openssl | 1:1.1.1k-19.el7jbcs · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-openssl-debuginfo | 1:1.1.1k-19.el7jbcs · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-openssl-devel | 1:1.1.1k-19.el7jbcs · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs | 1:1.1.1k-19.el7jbcs · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl | 1:1.1.1k-19.el7jbcs · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.6::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.6::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
+16
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2025-03-15 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+261 d
- TodayOct 26, 2026+851 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Joseph Birr-Pixtonfinder
- David Benjamin (Google)analyst
- Matt Caswellremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-9230460 days apartOut-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap30Monitor
- CVE-2025-9232460 days apartOut-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling24Monitor
- CVE-2023-1255434 days apartInput buffer over-read in AES-XTS implementation on 64 bit ARM23Monitor
- CVE-2024-9143111 days apartLow-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access19Monitor
- CVE-2022-4203489 days apartX.509 Name Constraints Read Buffer Overflow19Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-0818 · Jun 28, 2024(OpenSSL Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c
- github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c
- github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87
- www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/15/1
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0006/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0010/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.