CVE-2024-6119: Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 50/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 66.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.2% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.15, 3.1.7, 3.2.3; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 20240524git3e722403cd16-3, 3.3.2-1, 38.0.72.2-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 20240524git3e722403cd16-3, 3.3.2-1, 38.0.72.2-2.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.15, 3.1.7, 3.2.3; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 20240524git3e722403cd16-3, 3.3.2-1, 38.0.72.2-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 20240524git3e722403cd16-3, 3.3.2-1, 38.0.72.2-2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process. Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of service. Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the application program. Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address. TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity of the issue is Moderate. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
- Published
- Sep 3, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 66.5% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-843
Report tools
Action score
50
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 20 / 30 · 66.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
| netapp | management services for element software and netapp hci | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:management_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hci |
| netapp | ontap 9 | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_9 |
| netapp | ontap select deploy administration utility | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility |
| netapp | ontap tools | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_tools |
| netapp | brocade fabric operating system | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:brocade_fabric_operating_system |
| netapp | h300s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware |
| netapp | h300s | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s |
| netapp | h500s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware |
| netapp | h500s | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500s |
| netapp | h700s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700s_firmware |
and 19 more
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netapp 500f firmwareall versions
- netapp a250 firmwareall versions
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
- netapp bootstrap osall versions
- netapp brocade fabric operating systemall versions
- netapp c250 firmwareall versions
- netapp h300s firmwareall versions
- netapp h410c firmwareall versions
- netapp h410s firmwareall versions
- netapp h500s firmwareall versions
- netapp h610c firmwareall versions
- netapp h610s firmwareall versions
- netapp h615call versions
- netapp h700s firmwareall versions
- netapp management services for element software and netapp hciall versions
- netapp ontap 9all versions
- netapp ontap select deploy administration utilityall versions
- netapp ontap tools9
- openssl openssl3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.15
- openssl openssl3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.2affected · semver
- 3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.3affected · semver
- 3.1.0 and later · before 3.1.7affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.15affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | edk2-aarch64 | before 20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | edk2-ovmf | before 20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | edk2-tools | before 20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | edk2-tools-doc | before 20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| Alpine:v3.17 | openssl | from 3.0.0 · before 3.0.15-r0 | 3.0.15-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.18 | openssl | from 3.0.0 · before 3.1.7-r0 | 3.1.7-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.20 | openssl | from 3.0.0 · before 3.3.2-r0 | 3.3.2-r0 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.14-1~deb12u2 | 3.0.14-1~deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.3.2-1 | 3.3.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | openssl-3 | before 3.0.8-150500.5.42.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.42.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-150600.5.15.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.15.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-13.1 | 3.1.4-13.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | edk2 | before 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | edk2-aarch64 | before 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | edk2-ovmf | before 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-debugsource | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-devel | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-libs-debuginfo | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | openssl-perl | before 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 |
+14
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-4603May 16, 2024 · Excessive time spent checking DSA keys and parameters21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-5535Jun 27, 2024 · SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread38Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-9143Oct 16, 2024 · Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access38Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.15 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.1.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.2.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.3.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 20240524git3e722403cd16-3 · edk2 | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 3.3.2-1 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 38.0.72.2-2 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-3 · edk2 | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 3.3.2-1 · openssl | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 38.0.72.2-2 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 38.0.72.2-3 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 38.0.72.2-3 · cloud-hypervisor-cvm | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:edk2-aarch64 | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:edk2-ovmf | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:edk2-tools | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:edk2-tools-doc | 20231122-6.el9_4.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.0.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.17 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.14-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.0.8-150500.5.42.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:edk2 | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:edk2-aarch64 | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:edk2-debugsource | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:edk2-ovmf | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:edk2-tools | 0:20231122-6.el9_4.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:3.0.7-28.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
+10
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- David Benjamin (Google)finder
- Viktor Dukhovniremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-843 · Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4
- lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.