CVE-2024-45497: Openshift-api: openshift-controller-manager/build: build process in openshift allows overwriting of node pull credentials
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in the OpenShift build process, where the docker-build container is configured with a hostPath volume mount that maps the node's /var/lib/kubelet/config.json file into the build pod. This file contains sensitive credentials necessary for pulling images from private repositories. The mount is not read-only, which allows the attacker to overwrite it. By modifying the config.json file, the attacker can cause a denial of service by preventing the node from pulling new images and potentially exfiltrating sensitive secrets. This flaw impacts the availability of services dependent on image pulls and exposes sensitive information to unauthorized parties.
- Published
- Dec 30, 2024
- Updated
- Sep 21, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 48th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-732
Report tools
Action score
30
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.6
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
github.com/openshift openshift
- 4.16affected
Red Hat Red Hat Fuse 7
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12
- v4.12.0-202506062300.p0.gb870fc6.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13
- v4.13.0-202507061330.p0.g9abb220.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14
- v4.14.0-202506112307.p0.g700dc11.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16
- v4.16.0-202506062300.p0.gd26f300.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17
- v4.17.0-202507011904.p0.g2b2ba3b.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18
- v4.18.0-202506062012.p0.g0a6f6eb.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g68ae0c2.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g088dcaf.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g20a9ba5.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g0ae129b.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g98ae311.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.gb09f487.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506181037.p0.g686fdac.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g85353bb.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g5076dbc.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.19.0-202506111842.p0.g0bee2d9.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20
- ose-openshift-controller-manager-container-v4.20.0-202509261327.p2.gd9e543d.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-45496Openshift-controller-manager: elevated build pods can lead to node compromise in openshift39Monitor
- CVE-2024-7387Openshift/builder: path traversal allows command injection in privileged buildcontainer using docker build strategy37Monitor
- CVE-2026-49332Openshift/oauth-proxy: openshift/oauth-proxy: underscore header smuggling enables identity impersonation on wsgi/php upstreams34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-3154Apr 26, 2024 · Cri-o: arbitrary command injection via pod annotation28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-6508Aug 21, 2024 · Openshift-console: oauth2 insufficient state parameter entropy32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-15809Jul 15, 2026 · Github.com/cri-o/cri-o: fix bypass for cve-2022-4318 — /etc/passwd injection via home env31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-732 · Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical ResourceCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Privilege AbuseCAPEC-122likelihood: High · Medium
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security LevelsCAPEC-180likelihood: High · Medium
- Signing Malicious CodeCAPEC-206Very High
- Hijacking a privileged processCAPEC-234Medium
- Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)CAPEC-60likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Server Software Component: Terminal Services DLLT1505.005
- Abuse Elevation Control MechanismT1548
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Subvert Trust Controls:Code SigningT1553.002
- Compromise Client Software BinaryT1554
- Hijack Execution Flow:Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10294
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:10747
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9269
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9278
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9562
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9759
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9765
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45497
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308673
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.