CVE-2024-45496: Openshift-controller-manager: elevated build pods can lead to node compromise in openshift
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 63.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager (Go) 0.0.0-alpha.0.0.20240911.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager (Go) 0.0.0-alpha.0.0.20240911 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in OpenShift. This issue occurs due to the misuse of elevated privileges in the OpenShift Container Platform's build process. During the build initialization step, the git-clone container is run with a privileged security context, allowing unrestricted access to the node. An attacker with developer-level access can provide a crafted .gitconfig file containing commands executed during the cloning process, leading to arbitrary command execution on the worker node. An attacker running code in a privileged container could escalate their permissions on the node running the container.
- Published
- Sep 16, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.0% · 63th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-269
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 9.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
github.com/openshift/ openshift-controller-manager
- 4.12.0 and later · up to and including 4.18.0affected · semver
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12
- v4.12.0-202409131137.p1.g0b1971a.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13
- v4.13.0-202409130707.p1.gb75d499.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14
- v4.14.0-202409130708.p1.g9020ea1.assembly.stream.el8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15
- v4.15.0-202409131835.p1.gbe9d673.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16
- v4.16.0-202409130937.p1.g5dcfc99.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17
- v4.17.0-202409182235.p0.g7682a61.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g088dcaf.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.gd4fb1b6.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g11ced00.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.gf648c78.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g24a6532.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202502100301.p0.g2e139ed.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g3193a75.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202502041302.p0.g1ad8f2e.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g7149f2d.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.18.0-202501230001.p0.g7149f2d.assembly.stream.el9 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager | before 0.0.0-alpha.0.0.20240911 | 0.0.0-alpha.0.0.20240911 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-7387Openshift/builder: path traversal allows command injection in privileged buildcontainer using docker build strategy37Monitor
- CVE-2026-49332Openshift/oauth-proxy: openshift/oauth-proxy: underscore header smuggling enables identity impersonation on wsgi/php upstreams34Monitor
- CVE-2024-6508Openshift-console: oauth2 insufficient state parameter entropy32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-1139Apr 25, 2024 · Cluster-monitoring-operator: credentials leak30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-3154Apr 26, 2024 · Cri-o: arbitrary command injection via pod annotation28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-45497Dec 30, 2024 · Openshift-api: openshift-controller-manager/build: build process in openshift allows overwriting of node pull credentials30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager | 0.0.0-alpha.0.0.20240911 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-1483 · Sep 17, 2024(RedHat OpenShift Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
nvd-secondary
Root cause
To simplify setup, a service account is granted broad, cluster-wide permissions. The principle of least privilege is skipped during installation.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-269 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
kind: ClusterRole
rules:
- apiGroups: ["*"]
resources: ["*"]
verbs: ["*"]Fixed
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: lodos-system
rules:
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
resources: ["deployments"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "update"]Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6122
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6685
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6687
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6689
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6691
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6705
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45496
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308661
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.