CVE-2024-38569: drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 3d1face00ebb7996842aee4214d7d0fb0c77b1e9, 567d34626c22b36579ec0abfdf5eda2949044220, 77fce82678ea5fd51442e62febec2004f79e041b.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 3d1face00ebb7996842aee4214d7d0fb0c77b1e9, 567d34626c22b36579ec0abfdf5eda2949044220, 77fce82678ea5fd51442e62febec2004f79e041b or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write overflow of event_group array occurs. Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation, and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds. There are 9 different events in an event_group. [1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'
- Published
- Jun 19, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-129
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · Linux
- 7.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernel5.17 and later · before 6.1.93
- linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.33
- linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.8.12
- linux linux kernel6.9 and later · before 6.9.3
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 5.17affected
- 8404b0fbc7fbd42e5c5d28cdedd450e70829c77a and later · before 3d1face00ebb7996842aee4214d7d0fb0c77b1e9affected · git
- 8404b0fbc7fbd42e5c5d28cdedd450e70829c77a and later · before 8e9aab2492178f25372f1820bfd9289fbd74efd0affected · git
- 8404b0fbc7fbd42e5c5d28cdedd450e70829c77a and later · before 567d34626c22b36579ec0abfdf5eda2949044220affected · git
- 8404b0fbc7fbd42e5c5d28cdedd450e70829c77a and later · before ff48247144d13a3a0817127703724256008efa78affected · git
- 8404b0fbc7fbd42e5c5d28cdedd450e70829c77a and later · before 77fce82678ea5fd51442e62febec2004f79e041baffected · git
- before 5.17not affected · semver
- 6.1.93 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.33 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
- 6.8.12 and later · up to and including 6.8.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.94-1 | 6.1.94-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.8.12-1 | 6.8.12-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-38566Jun 19, 2024 · bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-38568Jun 19, 2024 · drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-38570Jun 19, 2024 · gfs2: Fix potential glock use-after-free on unmount31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 3d1face00ebb7996842aee4214d7d0fb0c77b1e9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 567d34626c22b36579ec0abfdf5eda2949044220 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 77fce82678ea5fd51442e62febec2004f79e041b | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 8e9aab2492178f25372f1820bfd9289fbd74efd0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | ff48247144d13a3a0817127703724256008efa78 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.94-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2021-4754826 days apartethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port()39Monitor
- CVE-2023-2008432 days apartKernel: udmabuf: improper validation of array index leading to local privilege escalation32Monitor
- CVE-2024-385520 days apartdrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function31Monitor
- CVE-2024-385560 days apartnet/mlx5: Add a timeout to acquire the command queue semaphore31Monitor
- CVE-2024-385620 days apartwifi: nl80211: Avoid address calculations via out of bounds array indexing31Monitor
- CVE-2024-385870 days apartspeakup: Fix sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE() bug31Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-129 · Improper Validation of Array IndexCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.