CVE-2022-32545: A vulnerability was found in ImageMagick, causing an outside the range of representable values of type 'unsigned char' at coders/psd.c, when
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 72% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: imagemagick (Debian:10) 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u5; imagemagick (Debian:12) 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.5; ImageMagick (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to imagemagick (Debian:10) 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u5; imagemagick (Debian:12) 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.5; ImageMagick (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability was found in ImageMagick, causing an outside the range of representable values of type 'unsigned char' at coders/psd.c, when crafted or untrusted input is processed. This leads to a negative impact to application availability or other problems related to undefined behavior.
- Published
- Jun 16, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.3% · 72th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| imagemagick | imagemagick | cpe:2.3:a:imagemagick:imagemagick |
| fedoraproject | extra packages for enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:extra_packages_for_enterprise_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject extra packages for enterprise linux8.0
- fedoraproject fedora36
- imagemagick imagemagickbefore 6.9.12-43
- imagemagick imagemagick7.1.0 and later · before 7.1.0-28
- redhat enterprise linux7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a ImageMagick
- Fixed in ImageMagick 6.9.12-43, ImageMagick 7.1.0-28affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | imagemagick | before 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u5 | 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u5 |
| Debian:12 | imagemagick | before 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.5 | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.5 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | ImageMagick | before 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 | 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | ImageMagick | before 7.1.0.9-150400.6.3.1 | 7.1.0.9-150400.6.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ImageMagick | before 7.1.1.17-1.1 | 7.1.1.17-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | ImageMagick | before 7.0.7.34-150000.3.123.1 | 7.0.7.34-150000.3.123.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP3 | ImageMagick | before 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 | 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP4 | ImageMagick | before 7.1.0.9-150400.6.3.1 | 7.1.0.9-150400.6.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ImageMagick | before 6.8.8.1-71.177.1 | 6.8.8.1-71.177.1 |
Same product
imagemagick: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-3714The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x beforKEV92Now
- CVE-2016-3718The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request KEV75This week
- CVE-2016-3715The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted imKEV75This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-1114Apr 29, 2022 · A heap-use-after-free flaw was found in ImageMagick's RelinquishDCMInfo() function of dcm.c file.28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-28463May 8, 2022 · ImageMagick 7.1.0-27 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-32546Jun 16, 2022 · A vulnerability was found in ImageMagick, causing an outside the range of representable values of type 'unsigned long' at coders/pcl.c, when31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:imagemagick | 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.5 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ImageMagick | 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ImageMagick | 7.0.7.34-150200.10.31.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.