The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image.
- Published
- May 5, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 76.7% · 100th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
75
This week
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 30 / 30 · Listed
- EPSS
- 23 / 30 · 76.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- active
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Actively exploited in the wild
CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Nov 3, 2021. That signals real attacks, not theory.
Remediation deadline for government agencies: May 3, 2022.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| imagemagick | imagemagick | cpe:2.3:a:imagemagick:imagemagick |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux for ibm z systems | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems |
| redhat | enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power big endian | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power big endian eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power little endian | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power little endian eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux hpc node | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node |
| redhat | enterprise linux hpc node eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
and 18 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux15.10
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- imagemagick imagemagickbefore 6.9.3-10
- imagemagick imagemagick7.0.0-0
- imagemagick imagemagick7.0.1-0
- opensuse leap42.1
- opensuse opensuse13.2
- oracle linux6
- oracle linux7
- oracle solaris10
- oracle solaris11.3
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
- redhat enterprise linux eus6.7
- redhat enterprise linux eus7.2
- redhat enterprise linux eus7.3
- redhat enterprise linux eus7.4
- redhat enterprise linux eus7.5
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | graphicsmagick | before 1.3.24-1 | 1.3.24-1 |
| Debian:12 | imagemagick | before 8:6.9.6.2+dfsg-2 | 8:6.9.6.2+dfsg-2 |
| Debian:7 | graphicsmagick | before 1.3.16-1.1+deb7u1 | 1.3.16-1.1+deb7u1 |
| Debian:7 | imagemagick | before 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u5 | 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u5 |
| Debian:8 | graphicsmagick | before 1.3.20-3+deb8u3 | 1.3.20-3+deb8u3 |
| Debian:8 | imagemagick | before 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u2 | 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | GraphicsMagick | before 1.3.25-1.1 | 1.3.25-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ImageMagick | before 6.9.6.6-1.1 | 6.9.6.6-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-c++ | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-c++-devel | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-debuginfo | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-devel | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-doc | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | ImageMagick-perl | before 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-c++ | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-c++-devel | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-debuginfo | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-devel | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-doc | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | ImageMagick-perl | before 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 | 0:6.7.8.9-13.el7_2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | ImageMagick | before 6.8.8.1-19.1 | 6.8.8.1-19.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | GraphicsMagick | before 1.2.5-4.35.1 | 1.2.5-4.35.1 |
+1
Same product
imagemagick: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-3714The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x beforKEV92Now
- CVE-2016-3715The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted imKEV75This week
- CVE-2022-44268ImageMagick 7.1.0-49 is vulnerable to Information Disclosure.53Plan
- CVE-2022-44267ImageMagick 7.1.0-49 is vulnerable to Denial of Service.49Plan
- CVE-2016-5841Integer overflow in MagickCore/profile.c in ImageMagick before 7.0.2-1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fa43Plan
- CVE-2004-0981Buffer overflow in the EXIF parsing routine in ImageMagick before 6.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a certain imag42Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:graphicsmagick | 1.3.24-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:imagemagick | 8:6.9.6.2+dfsg-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:GraphicsMagick | 1.3.25-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ImageMagick | 6.9.6.6-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-c++ | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-c++-devel | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-debuginfo | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-devel | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-doc | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ImageMagick-perl | 0:6.7.2.7-4.el6_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:GraphicsMagick | 1.2.5-4.35.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ImageMagick | 6.8.8.1-19.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | dos | 2016-05-04 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-2 d
- Published
- CISA KEV+2007 d
- TodaySep 30, 2026+3800 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0726.html
- www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3580
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/03/18
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2016-3090568.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538378/100/0/threaded
- www.slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2016&m=slackware-security.440568
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2990-1
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/06/msg00009.html
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201611-21
- www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767/
- www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29588
- www.imagemagick.org/script/changelog.php
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2016-3718
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.