In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 thru 9.4.46, and 10.0.0 thru 10.0.9, and 11.0.0 thru 11.0.9 versions, the parsing of the authority segment o
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 10/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 70.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: jetty9 (Debian:10) 9.4.16-0+deb10u2; jetty9 (Debian:11) 9.4.39-3+deb11u1; jetty9 (Debian:12) 9.4.48-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to jetty9 (Debian:10) 9.4.16-0+deb10u2; jetty9 (Debian:11) 9.4.39-3+deb11u1; jetty9 (Debian:12) 9.4.48-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 thru 9.4.46, and 10.0.0 thru 10.0.9, and 11.0.0 thru 11.0.9 versions, the parsing of the authority segment of an http scheme URI, the Jetty HttpURI class improperly detects an invalid input as a hostname. This can lead to failures in a Proxy scenario.
- Published
- Jul 7, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.3% · 70th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
10
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 10 / 40 · 2.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 2.7
- CNA · eclipse
- 2.7
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| eclipse | jetty | cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| netapp | element plug-in for vcenter server | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:element_plug-in_for_vcenter_server |
| netapp | management services for element software and netapp hci | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:management_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hci |
| netapp | snapcenter | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapcenter |
| netapp | solidfire \& hci storage node | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\&_hci_storage_node |
| netapp | hci compute node | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:hci_compute_node |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux11.0
- eclipse jettybefore 9.4.46
- eclipse jetty10.0.0 and later · before 10.0.9
- eclipse jetty11.0.0 and later · up to 11.0.9 inclusive
- netapp element plug-in for vcenter serverall versions
- netapp hci compute nodeall versions
- netapp management services for element software and netapp hciall versions
- netapp snapcenterall versions
- netapp solidfire & hci storage nodeall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (eclipse). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty
- 9.4.0 and later · before unspecifiedaffected
- unspecified and later · up to and including 9.4.46affected
- 10.0.0 and later · before unspecifiedaffected
- unspecified and later · up to and including 10.0.9affected
- 11.0.0 and later · before unspecifiedaffected
- unspecified and later · up to and including 11.0.9affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | jetty9 | before 9.4.16-0+deb10u2 | 9.4.16-0+deb10u2 |
| Debian:11 | jetty9 | before 9.4.39-3+deb11u1 | 9.4.39-3+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | jetty9 | before 9.4.48-1 | 9.4.48-1 |
| Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | from 10.0.0 · before 10.0.10 | 10.0.10 |
| Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | from 11.0.0 · before 11.0.10 | 11.0.10 |
| Maven | org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | before 9.4.47 | 9.4.47 |
Same product
eclipse: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-34429For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the con60This week
- CVE-2021-28164In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 to 9.4.38.v20210224, the default compliance mode allows requests with URIs that contain %2e or %2e%2e segm60This week
- CVE-2015-2080The exception handling code in Eclipse Jetty before 9.2.9.v20150224 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process mem53Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-28169Jun 8, 2021 · For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, it is possible for requests to the ConcatServlet with a doubly encoded path to a45Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-34428Jun 22, 2021 · For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, if an exception is thrown from the SessionListener#sessionDestroyed() method, th14Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-2048Jul 7, 2022 · In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up no31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:jetty9 | 9.4.48-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | 10.0.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | 11.0.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | 9.4.47 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.