CVE-2018-1116: A flaw was found in polkit before version 0.116.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 68.5% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: policykit-1 (Debian:12) 0.105-21; policykit-1 (Debian:8) 0.105-15~deb8u3; polkit (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.118-7.2.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to policykit-1 (Debian:12) 0.105-21; policykit-1 (Debian:8) 0.105-15~deb8u3; polkit (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.118-7.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in polkit before version 0.116. The implementation of the polkit_backend_interactive_authority_check_authorization function in polkitd allows to test for authentication and trigger authentication of unrelated processes owned by other users. This may result in a local DoS and information disclosure.
- Published
- Jul 10, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 68th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-285
Report tools
Action score
17
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.4
- CNA · redhat
- 4.7
- 0.3 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| polkit project | polkit | cpe:2.3:a:polkit_project:polkit |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
[UNKNOWN] polkit
- polkit 0.116affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- debian debian linux8.0
- polkit project polkitbefore 0.115
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | policykit-1 | before 0.105-21 | 0.105-21 |
| Debian:8 | policykit-1 | before 0.105-15~deb8u3 | 0.105-15~deb8u3 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | polkit | before 0.118-7.2 | 0.118-7.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | polkit | before 0:0.112-26.el7 | 0:0.112-26.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | polkit-debuginfo | before 0:0.112-26.el7 | 0:0.112-26.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | polkit-devel | before 0:0.112-26.el7 | 0:0.112-26.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | polkit-docs | before 0:0.112-26.el7 | 0:0.112-26.el7 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | polkit | before 0.113-5.9.1 | 0.113-5.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | polkit | before 0.114-3.3.1 | 0.114-3.3.1 |
Same product
debian: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-9079A use-after-free vulnerability in SVG Animation has been discovered.KEV86Now
- CVE-2024-44308The issue was addressed with improved checks.KEV68This week
- CVE-2021-25216A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack64This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-10852Jun 26, 2018 · The UNIX pipe which sudo uses to contact SSSD and read the available sudo rules from SSSD has too wide permissions, which means that anyone…30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-13054Jul 2, 2018 · An issue was discovered in Cinnamon 1.9.2 through 3.8.6.33Monitor
- Later →CVE-2018-14040Jul 13, 2018 · In Bootstrap before 4.1.2, XSS is possible in the collapse data-parent attribute.25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:policykit-1 | 0.105-21 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:polkit | 0.118-7.2 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:polkit | 0:0.112-26.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:polkit-debuginfo | 0:0.112-26.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:polkit-devel | 0:0.112-26.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:polkit-docs | 0:0.112-26.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:polkit | 0.113-5.9.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-20-189 · Apr 1, 2020(Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-285 · Improper AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data TokensCAPEC-39likelihood: High · Medium
- Bypassing ATA Password SecurityCAPEC-402
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Data from Local SystemT1005
- Query RegistryT1012
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in RegistryT1552.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data ManipulationT1565.002
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.