Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2021-25216· NVD / CVE Program· CNA isc

A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 28, 2021
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
82.4% · 100th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

64

This week

Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
25 / 30 · 82.4%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
9.8
CNA · isc
8.1
1.7 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
debiandebian linux
iscbind
siemenssinec infrastructure network services
netappactive iq unified manager
netappcloud backup
netappaff a250 firmware
netappaff a250
netappaff 500f firmware
netappaff 500f
netapph300s firmware
netapph300s
netapph500s firmware

and 11 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux10.0
  • debian debian linux9.0
  • isc bind9.17.0 and later · before 9.17.12
  • isc bind9.0.0 and later · before 9.11.31
  • isc bind9.12.0 and later · before 9.16.15
  • isc bind9.10.5
  • isc bind9.10.7
  • isc bind9.11.12
  • isc bind9.11.21
  • isc bind9.11.27
  • isc bind9.11.29
  • isc bind9.11.3
  • isc bind9.11.5
  • isc bind9.11.6
  • isc bind9.11.7
  • isc bind9.11.8
  • isc bind9.16.11
  • isc bind9.16.13
  • isc bind9.16.8
  • isc bind9.9.12

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ISC BIND9

    • Open Source Branches 9.5 though 9.11 9.5.0 through versions before 9.11.31, Open Source Branches 9.12 though 9.16 9.12.0 through versions before 9.16.14, Supported Preview Branch 9.11-S 9.11.3-S1 through versions before 9.11.31-S1, Supported Preview Branch 9.16-S 9.16.8-S1 through versions before 9.16.14-S1, Development Branch 9.17 9.17.0 through versions before 9.17.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.10bindfrom 9.0.0 · before 9.16.15-r09.16.15-r0
Debian:10bind9before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u51:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5
Debian:12bind9before 1:9.16.15-11:9.16.15-1
Debian:9bind9before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9
SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8bindbefore 9.9.9P1-63.25.19.9.9P1-63.25.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3bindbefore 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.19.9.6P1-0.51.26.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2016-9079A use-after-free vulnerability in SVG Animation has been discovered.KEV
    86Now
  • CVE-2024-44308The issue was addressed with improved checks.KEV
    68This week
  • CVE-2024-44309A cookie management issue was addressed with improved state management.KEV
    62This week
  • CVE-2016-2098Action Pack in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.22.2, 4.x before 4.1.14.2, and 4.2.x before 4.2.5.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Rub
    53Plan
  • CVE-2015-1592Movable Type Pro, Open Source, and Advanced before 5.2.12 and Pro and Advanced 6.0.x before 6.0.7 does not properly use the Perl Storable::t
    53Plan
  • CVE-2016-2851Integer overflow in proto.c in libotr before 4.1.1 on 64-bit platforms allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corrupti
    47Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Alpine:bind9.16.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.10Package registry (OSV)
Debian:bind91:9.16.15-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
SUSE:bind9.9.9P1-63.25.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records