CVE-2021-25216: A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
Noroxi assessment
Priority: This week (action score 64/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 82.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.15-r0; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.15-1.
- Mentioned 2 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window. Upgrade to bind (Alpine:v3.10) 9.16.15-r0; bind9 (Debian:10) 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5; bind9 (Debian:12) 1:9.16.15-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Published
- Apr 28, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 82.9% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
64
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 25 / 30 · 82.9%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · isc
- 8.1
- 1.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| isc | bind | cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind |
| siemens | sinec infrastructure network services | cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_infrastructure_network_services |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
| netapp | cloud backup | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:cloud_backup |
| netapp | aff a250 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_a250_firmware |
| netapp | aff a250 | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_a250 |
| netapp | aff 500f firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_500f_firmware |
| netapp | aff 500f | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_500f |
| netapp | h300s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware |
| netapp | h300s | cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s |
| netapp | h500s firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware |
and 11 more
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (isc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ISC BIND9
- Open Source Branches 9.5 though 9.11 9.5.0 through versions before 9.11.31, Open Source Branches 9.12 though 9.16 9.12.0 through versions before 9.16.14, Supported Preview Branch 9.11-S 9.11.3-S1 through versions before 9.11.31-S1, Supported Preview Branch 9.16-S 9.16.8-S1 through versions before 9.16.14-S1, Development Branch 9.17 9.17.0 through versions before 9.17.2affected
Affected versions · NVD (20)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- isc bind9.17.0 and later · before 9.17.12
- isc bind9.0.0 and later · before 9.11.31
- isc bind9.12.0 and later · before 9.16.15
- isc bind9.10.5
- isc bind9.10.7
- isc bind9.11.12
- isc bind9.11.21
- isc bind9.11.27
- isc bind9.11.29
- isc bind9.11.3
- isc bind9.11.5
- isc bind9.11.6
- isc bind9.11.7
- isc bind9.11.8
- isc bind9.16.11
- isc bind9.16.13
- isc bind9.16.8
- isc bind9.9.12
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.10 | bind | from 9.0.0 · before 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
| Debian:10 | bind9 | before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5 | 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5 |
| Debian:12 | bind9 | before 1:9.16.15-1 | 1:9.16.15-1 |
| Debian:9 | bind9 | before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9 | 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9 |
| SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | bind | before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | bind | before 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 | 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 |
Same product
debian: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2016-9079A use-after-free vulnerability in SVG Animation has been discovered.KEV86Now
- CVE-2024-44308The issue was addressed with improved checks.KEV68This week
- CVE-2024-44309A cookie management issue was addressed with improved state management.KEV62This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2018-5735Oct 30, 2019 · Backport of the fix for CVE-2017-3137 leads to assertion failure in validator.c:185830Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-25215Apr 28, 2021 · An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2015-1877Jun 2, 2021 · The open_generic_xdg_mime function in xdg-open in xdg-utils 1.1.0 rc1 in Debian, when using dash, does not properly handle local variables…36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:bind | 9.16.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:bind9 | 1:9.16.15-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:bind | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 · SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-22-0215 · Mar 11, 2022(Siemens Güvenlik Bildirimi)
- TR-21-0378 · May 4, 2021(Debian Güvenlik Güncellemesi Yayınladı)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/2
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/3
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/4
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25215
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00001.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210521-0006/
- www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4909
- www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-657/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.