CVE-2011-3607: Integer overflow in the ap_pregsub function in server/util.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.x through 2.0.64 and 2.2.x through 2.2.21, when…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 4.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 92.2% of all records.
- Fixed version: apache2 (Debian:12) 2.2.21-4; apache2 (Debian:5.0) 2.2.9-10+lenny12; apache2 (Debian:6.0) 2.2.16-6+squeeze6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to apache2 (Debian:12) 2.2.21-4; apache2 (Debian:5.0) 2.2.9-10+lenny12; apache2 (Debian:6.0) 2.2.16-6+squeeze6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Integer overflow in the ap_pregsub function in server/util.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.x through 2.0.64 and 2.2.x through 2.2.21, when the mod_setenvif module is enabled, allows local users to gain privileges via a .htaccess file with a crafted SetEnvIf directive, in conjunction with a crafted HTTP request header, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
- Published
- Nov 8, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 4.9% · 92th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-189
Report tools
Action score
18
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 4.9%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is Apache HTTP Server on your server exposed to the internet?Run a port scan
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | http server | cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server |
Using http server? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Apache HTTP)
Is Apache HTTP Server on your server exposed to the internet?
The free port scanner finds the open ports on your server and matches the service versions it can read against known vulnerabilities. No account needed.
Run a port scanAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache http server2.0
- apache http server2.0.28
- apache http server2.0.32
- apache http server2.0.34
- apache http server2.0.35
- apache http server2.0.36
- apache http server2.0.37
- apache http server2.0.38
+12 more rows
- apache http server2.0.39
- apache http server2.0.40
- apache http server2.0.41
- apache http server2.0.42
- apache http server2.0.43
- apache http server2.0.44
- apache http server2.0.45
- apache http server2.0.46
- apache http server2.0.47
- apache http server2.0.48
- apache http server2.0.49
- apache http server2.0.50
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | apache2 | before 2.2.21-4 | 2.2.21-4 |
| Debian:5.0 | apache2 | before 2.2.9-10+lenny12 | 2.2.9-10+lenny12 |
| Debian:6.0 | apache2 | before 2.2.16-6+squeeze6 | 2.2.16-6+squeeze6 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | httpd | before 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 | 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | httpd-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 | 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | mod_ssl | before 1:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 | 1:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | httpd-devel | before 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 | 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | httpd-manual | before 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 | 0:2.2.3-63.el5_8.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | httpd | before 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | httpd-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | httpd-devel | before 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | httpd-manual | before 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | httpd-tools | before 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | mod_ssl | before 1:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 | 1:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | httpd | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | httpd-devel | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | httpd-manual | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_ssl | before 1:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 | 1:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | httpd | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | httpd-devel | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | httpd-manual | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | httpd-tools | before 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 | 0:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_ssl | before 1:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 | 1:2.2.17-15.4.ep5.el6 |
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-42013Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49 and 2.4.50 (incomplete fix of CVE-2021-41773)KEV99Now
- CVE-2021-41773Path traversal and file disclosure vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.49KEV99Now
- CVE-2024-38475Apache HTTP Server weakness in mod_rewrite when first segment of substitution matches filesystem path.KEV96Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-3348Sep 20, 2011 · The mod_proxy_ajp module in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.2.21, when used with mod_proxy_balancer in certain configurations, allows…24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-3368Oct 5, 2011 · The mod_proxy module in the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.x through 1.3.42, 2.0.x through 2.0.64, and 2.2.x through 2.2.21 does not properly…47Plan
- Later →CVE-2011-4415Nov 8, 2011 · The ap_pregsub function in server/util.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.x through 2.0.64 and 2.2.x through 2.2.21, when the mod_setenvif…5Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:apache2 | 2.2.21-4 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-debuginfo | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-devel | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-manual | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:httpd-tools | 0:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_ssl | 1:2.2.15-15.el6_2.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | dos | 2011-11-02 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-6 d
- Published
- TodayNov 15, 2026+5486 d
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-189 · Numeric ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2011-11/0023.html
- h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03360041
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/Sep/msg00004.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133294460209056&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133494237717847&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134987041210674&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0128.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0542.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0543.html
- secunia.com/advisories/45793
- secunia.com/advisories/48551
- securitytracker.com/id?1026267
- www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2405
- www.fujitsu.com/global/support/software/security/products-f/interstage-201303e.html
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:003
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2015-1972971.html
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2012-392727.html
- www.osvdb.org/76744
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.