CVE-2010-0007: net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c in the ebtables module in the netfilter framework in the Linux kernel before 2.6.33-rc4 does not require the
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: linux-2.6 (Debian:4.0) 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2; linux-2.6.24 (Debian:4.0) 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9etch3; linux-2.6 (Debian:5.0) 2.6.26-21lenny3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to linux-2.6 (Debian:4.0) 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2; linux-2.6.24 (Debian:4.0) 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9etch3; linux-2.6 (Debian:5.0) 2.6.26-21lenny3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c in the ebtables module in the netfilter framework in the Linux kernel before 2.6.33-rc4 does not require the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability for setting or modifying rules, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and configure arbitrary network-traffic filtering via a modified ebtables application.
- Published
- Jan 19, 2010
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 34th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-264
Report tools
Action score
8
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernelup to 2.6.33 inclusive
- linux linux kernel2.6.0
- linux linux kernel2.6.1
- linux linux kernel2.6.10
- linux linux kernel2.6.11
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.1
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.10
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.11
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.12
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.2
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.3
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.4
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.5
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.6
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.7
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.8
- linux linux kernel2.6.11.9
- linux linux kernel2.6.12
- linux linux kernel2.6.12.1
- linux linux kernel2.6.12.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:4.0 | linux-2.6 | before 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2 | 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2 |
| Debian:4.0 | linux-2.6.24 | before 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9etch3 | 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9etch3 |
| Debian:5.0 | linux-2.6 | before 2.6.26-21lenny3 | 2.6.26-21lenny3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-debuginfo | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-devel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-doc | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-hugemem | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-hugemem-devel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-largesmp | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-largesmp-devel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-smp | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-smp-devel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-xenU | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-xenU-devel | before 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-debug | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-debug-debuginfo | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-debug-devel | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-debuginfo | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-debuginfo-common | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-devel | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-doc | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | kernel-headers | before 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 | 0:2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 |
+23
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-4538Jan 12, 2010 · drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c in the e1000e driver in the Linux kernel 2.6.32.3 and earlier does not properly check the size of an Ethernet fr43Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2009-4141Jan 19, 2010 · Use-after-free vulnerability in the fasync_helper function in fs/fcntl.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.33-rc4-git1 allows local users to ga28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2010-0003Jan 26, 2010 · The print_fatal_signal function in kernel/signal.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.32.4 on the i386 platform, when print-fatal-signals is ena21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:linux-2.6 | 2.6.26-21lenny3 · Debian:5.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:linux-2.6.24 | 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9etch3 · Debian:4.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debuginfo | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-devel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-doc | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-hugemem | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-hugemem-devel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-largesmp | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-largesmp-devel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-smp | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-smp-devel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-xenU | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-xenU-devel | 0:2.6.9-89.0.23.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-264 · Permissions, Privileges, and Access ControlsCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034250.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00008.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00002.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00007.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-03/msg00000.html
- secunia.com/advisories/38133
- secunia.com/advisories/38296
- secunia.com/advisories/38333
- secunia.com/advisories/38492
- secunia.com/advisories/38779
- secunia.com/advisories/39033
- secunia.com/advisories/43315
- www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1996
- www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2005
- www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.33-rc4
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:051
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/01/14/1
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/01/14/3
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.