CVE-2026-93119: usb: ljca: bound bank_num in ljca_enumerate_gpio()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 0069593170a3d177de793c9a0b36989c4f069111, 9c4bc8f7426aa001387800bf0140bfc5087a6de3, aed958c4f784a29cf42abb3e54af51a16bddde46.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 0069593170a3d177de793c9a0b36989c4f069111, 9c4bc8f7426aa001387800bf0140bfc5087a6de3, aed958c4f784a29cf42abb3e54af51a16bddde46 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: ljca: bound bank_num in ljca_enumerate_gpio() ljca_enumerate_gpio() reads desc->bank_num from the device and loops valid_pin[i] = get_unaligned_le32(...) for i < bank_num. valid_pin[] holds only LJCA_MAX_GPIO_NUM / 32 = 2 entries. Two checks run before the loop. The reply length must match struct_size(desc, bank_desc, bank_num). The product pins_per_bank * bank_num must not exceed LJCA_MAX_GPIO_NUM. Neither one bounds bank_num against the size of valid_pin[]. The reply is capped at LJCA_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE (60) bytes, so the struct_size check limits bank_num to 9. A device that reports bank_num 9 with pins_per_bank 7 still passes both checks. gpio_num is 63 and the reply is 56 bytes. The loop then writes nine u32 into the two entry array and overruns valid_pin[] on the stack. A broken or malicious LJCA device can therefore overflow the stack. Reject a bank_num that does not fit valid_pin[].
- Published
- Sep 17, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 9th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.7affected
- acd6199f195d6de814ac4090ce0864a613b1580e and later · before 0069593170a3d177de793c9a0b36989c4f069111affected · git
- acd6199f195d6de814ac4090ce0864a613b1580e and later · before aed958c4f784a29cf42abb3e54af51a16bddde46affected · git
- acd6199f195d6de814ac4090ce0864a613b1580e and later · before 9c4bc8f7426aa001387800bf0140bfc5087a6de3affected · git
- acd6199f195d6de814ac4090ce0864a613b1580e and later · before dd9483726d0f16c1a56879c3edb65128259a4e2baffected · git
- before 6.7not affected · semver
- 6.12.110 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
- 6.18.52 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 7.2.6 and later · up to and including 7.2.*not affected · semver
- 7.3 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux-6.12 | before 6.12.111-1~deb12u1 | 6.12.111-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.111-1 | 6.12.111-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 7.2.6-1 | 7.2.6-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-93117Sep 17, 2026 · usb: fix UAF when probe runs concurrent to dyn ID removal0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-93118Sep 17, 2026 · usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: check endpoint DMA allocation0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-93120Sep 17, 2026 · usb: gadget: configfs: fix out-of-bounds read of qw_sign0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 0069593170a3d177de793c9a0b36989c4f069111 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 9c4bc8f7426aa001387800bf0140bfc5087a6de3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | aed958c4f784a29cf42abb3e54af51a16bddde46 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | dd9483726d0f16c1a56879c3edb65128259a4e2b | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.12.111-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:linux-6.12 | 6.12.111-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.