CVE-2026-86805: AT_SECURE programs may load attacker-controlled code via $ORIGIN
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.09% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the dynamic loader (ld.so) of the GNU C Library (glibc) versions 2.14 through 2.44 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges. When expanding $ORIGIN in DT_RPATH for setuid/setgid (AT_SECURE) programs, glibc validates the lexically normalized search path against the trusted directories but then opens the raw, un-normalized path. On systems where the Linux fs.protected_hardlinks sysctl is disabled, a local attacker who hard-links such a program into an attacker-controlled directory and wins a race to replace an intermediate path component with a symbolic link can direct the loader outside the trusted directory, causing it to load an attacker-controlled shared object and execute arbitrary code with the elevated privileges of the program. Exploitation requires an installed setuid or setgid binary whose DT_RPATH uses $ORIGIN followed by ".." traversal that normalizes into a trusted directory, and the ability to hard-link that binary and win the race by swapping a path component for a symbolic link. Major Linux-based OS distributions ship with fs.protected_hardlinks enabled by default and mitigate the vulnerability.
- Published
- Sep 22, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.0% · 0th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-367
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · glibc
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (glibc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The GNU C Library glibc
- 2.14 and later · before 2.45affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-all-langpacks | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-devel | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-doc | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-gconv-extra | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-headers | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-aa | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-af | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-agr | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-ak | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-am | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-an | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-anp | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-ast | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-ayc | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-az | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bem | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-ber | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bg | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bho | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bi | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bn | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-bo | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glibc-langpack-br | before 2.34-284.el9_8.4 | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 |
+96
Same product
the gnu c library: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-19499Buffer overflow in strfmon and strfmon_l right-justification padding30Monitor
- CVE-2026-84243gettext: Directory traversal via the LANGUAGE environment variable28Monitor
- CVE-2026-6791Potential stack-based buffer clash during tilde expansion in wordexp26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80489Sep 15, 2026 · EUC_JISX0213 decoding may hang on crafted input23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-8674Sep 17, 2026 · Assertion failure in the DNS stub resolver with a long search domain21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-95818Sep 22, 2026 · AT_SECURE program buffer overflow via $ORIGIN processing14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 | Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:glibc | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-all-langpacks | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-devel | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-doc | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-gconv-extra | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-headers | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-aa | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-af | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-agr | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-ak | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-am | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-an | 2.34-284.el9_8.4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:glibc | 2.43-7 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc | 2.44-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-aarch64-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-ppc64le-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-riscv64-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-s390x-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:compat-libpthread-nonshared | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-all-langpacks | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-benchtests | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-common | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-devel | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-doc | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-gconv-extra | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-langpack-aa | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-langpack-af | 0:2.43-8.7.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Jann HornGooglefinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-367 · Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race ConditionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.