CVE-2026-8674: Assertion failure in the DNS stub resolver with a long search domain
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.31% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.
- Published
- Sep 17, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 18, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-617
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · glibc
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (glibc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The GNU C Library glibc
- 2.26 and later · up to and including 2.44affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-all-langpacks | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-benchtests | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-common | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-devel | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-doc | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-gconv-extra | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-aa | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-af | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-agr | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-ak | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-am | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-an | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-anp | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-ar | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-as | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-ast | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-ayc | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-az | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-be | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-bem | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-ber | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-bg | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-langpack-bhb | before 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 |
+96
Same product
the gnu c library: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-19499Buffer overflow in strfmon and strfmon_l right-justification padding30Monitor
- CVE-2026-6791Potential stack-based buffer clash during tilde expansion in wordexp26Monitor
- CVE-2026-86805AT_SECURE programs may load attacker-controlled code via $ORIGIN25Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-77117Sep 15, 2026 · SHIFT_JISX0213 decoding may hang on crafted input23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80489Sep 15, 2026 · EUC_JISX0213 decoding may hang on crafted input23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-95818Sep 22, 2026 · AT_SECURE program buffer overflow via $ORIGIN processing14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 glibc 2.38-21 on Azure Linux 3.0 | Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:glibc | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-all-langpacks | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-benchtests | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-common | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-devel | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-doc | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-gconv-extra | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-aa | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-af | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-agr | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-ak | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-am | 2.39-145.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:glibc | 2.43-6 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc | 2.44-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-aarch64-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-ppc64le-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-riscv64-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-s390x-src | 2.40-160000.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:compat-libpthread-nonshared | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-all-langpacks | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-benchtests | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-common | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-devel | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-doc | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-gconv-extra | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-langpack-aa | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-langpack-af | 0:2.43-8.6.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Joshua RogersAISLE Research Teamfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-617 · Reachable AssertionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.