CVE-2026-86344: 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: unauthenticated worker-thread-pool exhaustion via completed-operation-then-incomplete-pdu connection requeue
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.34% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: 389-ds (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.3.1+28b6d8afc-1.1; 389-ds (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS) 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150500.3.54.1; 389-ds (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS) 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150600.8.38.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to 389-ds (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.3.1+28b6d8afc-1.1; 389-ds (SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS) 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150500.3.54.1; 389-ds (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS) 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150600.8.38.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.
- Published
- Oct 1, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 28th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 13
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | 389-ds-base | from 0 | — |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | 389-ds | before 3.3.1+28b6d8afc-1.1 | 3.3.1+28b6d8afc-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | 389-ds | before 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150500.3.54.1 | 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150500.3.54.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | 389-ds | before 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150600.8.38.1 | 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150600.8.38.1 |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-86345389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: starttls plaintext-buffer retention allows on-path attacker to forge an ldap client's authentication result36Monitor
- CVE-2026-117548389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: null pointer dereference via modifydn using an attribute's schema alias name causes denial of service26Monitor
- CVE-2026-19404389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: missing authorization allows anonymous clients to start or abort cleanallruv replication maintenance26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-11884Jun 10, 2026 · 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow in schema objectclass serialization due to missing oc_superior in size calculation26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-16560Jul 22, 2026 · 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap-buffer-overflow in rdn_av_swap on quoted multivalued rdn21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-18663Aug 12, 2026 · 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication double-free in get_ldapmessage_controls_ext() via critical session tracking control23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse:389-ds | 3.3.1+28b6d8afc-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:389-ds | 2.2.11~git12.1e612cde2-150600.8.38.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recorded+28 d
- TodayNov 10, 2026+39 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) {
return node.children.map(expand);
}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;
function expand(node, depth = 0) {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");
return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.