net/ionic: avoid OOB TX partner lookup for hwstamp RXQ
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.16% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 39fc615e355b65b8d43be30da57aa95ae6eaf688, 881a805a8029ba48c0ce81c6674910f8d83f7afb, d92255b405fb6f5acca408239ccd742e0a42c9cb.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 39fc615e355b65b8d43be30da57aa95ae6eaf688, 881a805a8029ba48c0ce81c6674910f8d83f7afb, d92255b405fb6f5acca408239ccd742e0a42c9cb or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ionic: avoid OOB TX partner lookup for hwstamp RXQ The dedicated hardware timestamp RX queue is allocated with q->index equal to lif->ionic->nrxqs_per_lif. The normal txqcqs array only contains the regular queue pairs, so using that index to set rxq->partner can read one entry past txqcqs[] and then write through the derived pointer. Only link RX/TX partners for normal queue-pair indexes. Leave the hwstamp RX queue unpaired, and make the XDP_TX path abort cleanly if an RX queue has no TX partner.
- Published
- Sep 4, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 5th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.9affected
- 8eeed8373e1cca836799bf8e4a05cffa8e444908 and later · before 881a805a8029ba48c0ce81c6674910f8d83f7afbaffected · git
- 8eeed8373e1cca836799bf8e4a05cffa8e444908 and later · before 39fc615e355b65b8d43be30da57aa95ae6eaf688affected · git
- 8eeed8373e1cca836799bf8e4a05cffa8e444908 and later · before f3868046e8e2e761d4d943a232bd109ff22a7d5baffected · git
- 8eeed8373e1cca836799bf8e4a05cffa8e444908 and later · before ea081b4435515ac7177eb598a3c0678d1b9e7911affected · git
- 8eeed8373e1cca836799bf8e4a05cffa8e444908 and later · before d92255b405fb6f5acca408239ccd742e0a42c9cbaffected · git
- before 6.9not affected · semver
- 6.12.106 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
- 6.18.47 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 7.1.11 and later · up to and including 7.1.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux-6.12 | before 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 | 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.107-1 | 6.12.107-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 7.1.12-1 | 7.1.12-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80777Sep 4, 2026 · futex/pi: Plug private futex exec() race0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80778Sep 4, 2026 · futex/pi: Reject cross-mm private futex owners0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-80780Sep 4, 2026 · HID: pidff: fix OOB write when hid->inputs is empty0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 39fc615e355b65b8d43be30da57aa95ae6eaf688 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 881a805a8029ba48c0ce81c6674910f8d83f7afb | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | d92255b405fb6f5acca408239ccd742e0a42c9cb | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | ea081b4435515ac7177eb598a3c0678d1b9e7911 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | f3868046e8e2e761d4d943a232bd109ff22a7d5b | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.12.107-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:linux-6.12 | 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.