CVE-2026-80255: secure cookie attribute bypass with tab
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.47% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: curl curl 4f6aa41a0145e930e766775dbe860883d350aa0a, 8.14.2, 8.16.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to curl curl 4f6aa41a0145e930e766775dbe860883d350aa0a, 8.14.2, 8.16.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A `Set-Cookie:` header using tab (horizontal tab, ASCII code 9) instead of space (ascii code 32) immediately before the `Secure` attribute causes curl to store the cookie without its Secure flag. The cookie might then wrongfully be sent over plaintext HTTP on subsequent requests to the same host.
- Published
- Sep 6, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 41th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-201
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| haxx | curl | cpe:2.3:a:haxx:curl |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- haxx curl8.13.0 and later · before 8.22.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (curl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
curl curl
- 8.21.0, 8.20.0, 8.19.0, 8.18.0, 8.17.0, 8.16.0, 8.15.0, 8.14.1, 8.14.0, 8.13.0affected
- 8.13.0 and later · before 8.14.2affected · semver
- 8.15.0 and later · before 8.16.1affected · semver
- 8.17.0 and later · before 8.20.1affected · semver
- 8.21.0 and later · before 8.22.0affected · semver
- 1aea05a6c2699e80c75936d58569851555acd603 and later · before 4f6aa41a0145e930e766775dbe860883d350aa0aaffected · git
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.23 | curl | from 8.13.0 · before 8.22.0-r0 | 8.22.0-r0 |
| Debian:13 | curl | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | curl | before 8.22.0-1 | 8.22.0-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | curl | before 8.22.0-1.1 | 8.22.0-1.1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | curl | before 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | libcurl | before 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | libcurl-devel | before 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 |
| Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | libcurl-minimal | before 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 |
Same product
haxx: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-22901curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session t51Plan
- CVE-2023-38039When curl retrieves an HTTP response, it stores the incoming headers so that
they can be accessed later via the libcurl headers API.47Plan
- CVE-2024-2398HTTP/2 push headers memory-leak45Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80230Sep 6, 2026 · OpenSSL pinning bypass30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-80231Sep 6, 2026 · native CA store conn reuse30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-82208Sep 6, 2026 · wolfSSL CA-cache hit overrides callback30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| curl curl | 4f6aa41a0145e930e766775dbe860883d350aa0a | Vendor (CNA) |
| curl curl | 8.14.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| curl curl | 8.16.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| curl curl | 8.20.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| curl curl | 8.22.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 rust 1.75.0-30 on Azure Linux 3.0 | — | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| alpine:curl | 8.22.0-r0 · Alpine:v3.23 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:curl | 8.22.0-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:curl | 8.22.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:curl | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcurl | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcurl-devel | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcurl-minimal | 0:8.22.0-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)finder
- Daniel Stenbergremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-892465 days aparttrailing dot domain super cookie36Monitor
- CVE-2026-822090 days apartdomain-scoped PSL domain cookie32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-201 · Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent DataCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Choosing Message IdentifierCAPEC-12likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Incorrectly Configured SSL/TLSCAPEC-217likelihood: Low
- WiFi MAC Address TrackingCAPEC-612Low
- WiFi SSID TrackingCAPEC-613Low
- Cellular Broadcast Message RequestCAPEC-618Low
- Signal Strength TrackingCAPEC-619Low
- Analysis of Packet Timing and SizesCAPEC-621Low
- Electromagnetic Side-Channel AttackCAPEC-622Low
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.