CVE-2026-78678: GitPython before 3.1.59 Arbitrary File Read via Repo.blame()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.41% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: gitpython-developers GitPython 3.1.59.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to gitpython-developers GitPython 3.1.59 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
GitPython versions before 3.1.59 contain an incomplete denylist in the unsafe_git_revision_options guard that omits --contents and -S options, allowing attackers to read arbitrary files by passing these options to Repo.blame(). Attackers can supply revision values like --contents=/etc/passwd to leak file contents through the blame result returned to the caller.
- Published
- Aug 25, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 12, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 35th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-88
Report tools
Action score
28
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 7.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gitpython project | gitpython | cpe:2.3:a:gitpython_project:gitpython |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
gitpython-developers GitPython
- 3.1.59not affected
- before 3.1.59affected · semver
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gitpython project gitpythonbefore 3.1.59
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.24 | py3-gitpython | before 3.1.61-r0 | 3.1.61-r0 |
| Debian:12 | python-git | before 3.1.30-1+deb12u3 | 3.1.30-1+deb12u3 |
| Debian:13 | python-git | before 3.1.44-1+deb13u1 | 3.1.44-1+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | python-git | before 3.1.61-1 | 3.1.61-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-GitPython | before 3.1.59-3.1 | 3.1.59-3.1 |
| PyPI | gitpython | before 3.1.59 | 3.1.59 |
Same product
gitpython project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-24439Remote Code Execution (RCE)41Plan
- CVE-2026-42284GitPython: Unsafe option check validates multi_options before shlex.split transforms it39Monitor
- CVE-2023-40267GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clone_from.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-78676Aug 25, 2026 · GitPython before 3.1.59 Remote Code Execution via Config Injection37Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-78677Aug 25, 2026 · GitPython before 3.1.59 Path Traversal via separate-git-dir34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-87817Sep 9, 2026 · GitPython before 3.1.60 Remote Code Execution via Git Directory Impersonation34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| gitpython-developers GitPython | 3.1.59 | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:py3-gitpython | 3.1.61-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python-git | 3.1.30-1+deb12u3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python-git | 3.1.44-1+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python-git | 3.1.61-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-GitPython | 3.1.59-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:gitpython | 3.1.59 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- manus-usereporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-42284110 days apartGitPython: Unsafe option check validates multi_options before shlex.split transforms it39Monitor
- CVE-2026-786760 days apartGitPython before 3.1.59 Remote Code Execution via Config Injection37Monitor
- CVE-2026-762206 days apartGitPython before 3.1.58 Command Execution via split_single_char_options34Monitor
- CVE-2026-762186 days apartGitPython before 3.1.58 Remote Code Execution via Repo.init30Monitor
- CVE-2026-762196 days apartGitPython before 3.1.58 Arbitrary File Overwrite via read-tree28Monitor
- CVE-2026-7362412 days apartGitPython before 3.1.54 Arbitrary File Overwrite via diff28Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-88 · Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Parameter InjectionCAPEC-137likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Flash Parameter InjectionCAPEC-174likelihood: High · Medium
- Using Meta-characters in E-mail Headers to Inject Malicious PayloadsCAPEC-41likelihood: High · High
- HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP)CAPEC-460Medium
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.