CVE-2026-74277: iommu/dma-iommu: Fix wrong scatterlist length assignment in P2PDMA path
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 6166cb1344f16dd403f2192f4bea6f6654f1ae1e, 8646f00ce021e49f4f05bc1d4060a0c27b25d0e1, db50fb87015b955a5a0c155293b2dd40d63a3b9e.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 6166cb1344f16dd403f2192f4bea6f6654f1ae1e, 8646f00ce021e49f4f05bc1d4060a0c27b25d0e1, db50fb87015b955a5a0c155293b2dd40d63a3b9e or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/dma-iommu: Fix wrong scatterlist length assignment in P2PDMA path In iommu_dma_map_sg(), when handling PCI P2PDMA cases, the DMA length of the current scatterlist segment `s` is incorrectly assigned from the head entry `sg->length` instead of the current entry `s->length`. This typo causes all P2PDMA segments in the scatterlist to inherit the length of the first segment, leading to corrupted DMA lengths for multi- segment scatterlists. Fix this by using `s->length` instead of `sg->length`.
- Published
- Aug 15, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 6th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Linux
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.16affected
- a25e7962db0d79882c9d32fd2a67a02e79129c0e and later · before 6166cb1344f16dd403f2192f4bea6f6654f1ae1eaffected · git
- a25e7962db0d79882c9d32fd2a67a02e79129c0e and later · before 8646f00ce021e49f4f05bc1d4060a0c27b25d0e1affected · git
- a25e7962db0d79882c9d32fd2a67a02e79129c0e and later · before db50fb87015b955a5a0c155293b2dd40d63a3b9eaffected · git
- before 6.16not affected · semver
- 6.18.57 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 7.1.5 and later · up to and including 7.1.*not affected · semver
- 7.2 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:14 | linux | before 7.1.5-1 | 7.1.5-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-74272Aug 15, 2026 · cxl/region: Resolve region deletion races0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-74273Aug 15, 2026 · cxl/region: Block region delete during region creation0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-74278Aug 15, 2026 · ALSA: seq: Fix kernel heap address leak in bounce_error_event()0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 6166cb1344f16dd403f2192f4bea6f6654f1ae1e | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 8646f00ce021e49f4f05bc1d4060a0c27b25d0e1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | db50fb87015b955a5a0c155293b2dd40d63a3b9e | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 7.1.5-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.