ocfs2: add journal NULL check in ocfs2_checkpoint_inode()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 24daf13422e8328fd588c34a017bdef1949910e8, 499714de42ab4d2e778cbb10186684142a1222eb, 63921f790234b221e4b15c56c72888b13250f81d.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 24daf13422e8328fd588c34a017bdef1949910e8, 499714de42ab4d2e778cbb10186684142a1222eb, 63921f790234b221e4b15c56c72888b13250f81d or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: add journal NULL check in ocfs2_checkpoint_inode() During unmount, ocfs2_journal_shutdown() frees the journal and sets osb->journal to NULL. Later, when VFS evicts remaining cached inodes, ocfs2_evict_inode() -> ocfs2_clear_inode() -> ocfs2_checkpoint_inode() -> ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed() dereferences osb->journal, causing a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this by adding a NULL check for osb->journal in ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(). If the journal is NULL, it has already been fully flushed and destroyed during shutdown, so there is nothing to checkpoint.
- Published
- Aug 15, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 10th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 5.16affected
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before 24daf13422e8328fd588c34a017bdef1949910e8affected · git
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before 7da7e4ac21895fe34cceffcfc99497cc2750da99affected · git
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before eb6a13834c23e291f1170cb1b489ec255edfa5a3affected · git
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before 499714de42ab4d2e778cbb10186684142a1222ebaffected · git
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before 63921f790234b221e4b15c56c72888b13250f81daffected · git
- da5e7c87827e8caa6a1eeec6d95dcf74ab592a01 and later · before a291c77c034b7a81849ce9b71cc9ecda9e587d89affected · git
- before 5.16not affected · semver
- 6.1.178 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.145 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.180-1 | 6.1.180-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.100-1 | 6.12.100-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 7.1.5-1 | 7.1.5-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-72158Aug 15, 2026 · fpga: dfl: add bounds check in dfh_get_param_size()0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-72159Aug 15, 2026 · ocfs2: reject non-inline dinodes with i_size and zero i_clusters0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-72163Aug 15, 2026 · ocfs2: fix NULL h_transaction deref in ocfs2_assure_trans_credits0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 24daf13422e8328fd588c34a017bdef1949910e8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 499714de42ab4d2e778cbb10186684142a1222eb | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 63921f790234b221e4b15c56c72888b13250f81d | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 7da7e4ac21895fe34cceffcfc99497cc2750da99 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | a291c77c034b7a81849ce9b71cc9ecda9e587d89 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | eb6a13834c23e291f1170cb1b489ec255edfa5a3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.180-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/499714de42ab4d2e778cbb10186684142a1222eb
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/63921f790234b221e4b15c56c72888b13250f81d
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/7da7e4ac21895fe34cceffcfc99497cc2750da99
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/a291c77c034b7a81849ce9b71cc9ecda9e587d89
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb6a13834c23e291f1170cb1b489ec255edfa5a3
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.