Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA Linux

CVE-2026-64274: Input: goodix - clamp the device-reported contact count

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.16% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: Linux Linux 2a67668690129953e898923260a2dd1c7c196495, 3b32303460155603d25444274856013d211d5e1f, 46addbd13dbf4aacb71cfbca964a5e552d0f45ae.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 2a67668690129953e898923260a2dd1c7c196495, 3b32303460155603d25444274856013d211d5e1f, 46addbd13dbf4aacb71cfbca964a5e552d0f45ae or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: goodix - clamp the device-reported contact count goodix_ts_read_input_report() copies the number of touch points reported by the device into an on-stack buffer u8 point_data[2 + GOODIX_MAX_CONTACT_SIZE * GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS]; which is sized for at most GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS (10) contacts. The only runtime check bounds the per-interrupt count against ts->max_touch_num, but that value is taken verbatim from a 4-bit field of the device configuration block and is never clamped: ts->max_touch_num = ts->config[MAX_CONTACTS_LOC] & 0x0f; The nibble can be 0..15, so a malfunctioning, malicious or counterfeit controller (or an attacker tampering with the I2C bus) can advertise up to 15 contacts. goodix_ts_read_input_report() then accepts a touch_num of up to 15 and the second goodix_i2c_read() writes ts->contact_size * (touch_num - 1) bytes past the one-contact header into point_data - up to 30 bytes (45 with the 9-byte report format) beyond the 92-byte buffer: a stack out-of-bounds write. Clamp max_touch_num to GOODIX_MAX_CONTACTS, the number of contacts point_data[] is sized for, when reading it from the configuration.

HighCVSS 7.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 25, 2026
Updated
Oct 24, 2026
EPSS
0.1% · 6th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.1%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-64274

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
linuxlinux kernel

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • linux linux kernel4.1 and later · before 5.10.261
  • linux linux kernel5.11 and later · before 5.15.212
  • linux linux kernel5.16 and later · before 6.1.178
  • linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.145
  • linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.12.96
  • linux linux kernel6.13 and later · before 6.18.39
  • linux linux kernel6.19 and later · before 7.1.4

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Linux Linux

    • 4.1affected
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before e825f352ef5271255cd08cc994b0dc25648a2f38affected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 4bfea9c3a0981c1c7fc5d1a1b27197b2de247902affected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 98b2caef249183b572c04451365246f919707845affected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 719d1a2c83a46be6bf81af905e4f6adb3d32dc28affected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 46addbd13dbf4aacb71cfbca964a5e552d0f45aeaffected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 3b32303460155603d25444274856013d211d5e1faffected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 2a67668690129953e898923260a2dd1c7c196495affected · git
    • a7ac7c95d4682883d141c5d7a7544d2818f0a09f and later · before 5ed62a96e06be4e94b8296b7932afee550a70e04affected · git
    • before 4.1not affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxbefore 6.1.180-16.1.180-1
Debian:12linux-6.12before 6.12.100-1~deb12u16.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13linuxbefore 6.12.96-16.12.96-1
Debian:14linuxbefore 7.1.4-17.1.4-1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV
    89Now
  • CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV
    85Now

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-64272Jul 25, 2026 · Input: mms114 - fix touch indexing for MMS134S and MMS136
    31Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-64273Jul 25, 2026 · Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index
    31Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-64275Jul 25, 2026 · Input: elan_i2c - prevent division by zero and arithmetic underflow
    22Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Linux Linux2a67668690129953e898923260a2dd1c7c196495Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux3b32303460155603d25444274856013d211d5e1fVendor (CNA)
Linux Linux46addbd13dbf4aacb71cfbca964a5e552d0f45aeVendor (CNA)
Linux Linux4bfea9c3a0981c1c7fc5d1a1b27197b2de247902Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux5ed62a96e06be4e94b8296b7932afee550a70e04Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux719d1a2c83a46be6bf81af905e4f6adb3d32dc28Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux98b2caef249183b572c04451365246f919707845Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxe825f352ef5271255cd08cc994b0dc25648a2f38Vendor (CNA)
debian:linux6.1.180-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records